Ludvigsen Mette S, Hall Elisabeth O C, Meyer Gabriele, Fegran Liv, Aagaard Hanne, Uhrenfeldt Lisbeth
Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Qual Health Res. 2016 Feb;26(3):320-9. doi: 10.1177/1049732315576493. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
The purpose of this article was to iteratively account for and discuss the handling of methodological challenges in two qualitative research syntheses concerning patients' experiences of hospital transition. We applied Sandelowski and Barroso's guidelines for synthesizing qualitative research, and to our knowledge, this is the first time researchers discuss their methodological steps. In the process, we identified a need for prolonged discussions to determine mutual understandings of the methodology. We discussed how to identify the appropriate qualitative research literature and how to best conduct exhaustive literature searches on our target phenomena. Another finding concerned our status as third-order interpreters of participants' experiences and what this meant for synthesizing the primary findings. Finally, we discussed whether our studies could be classified as metasummaries or metasyntheses. Although we have some concerns regarding the applicability of the methodology, we conclude that following Sandelowski and Barroso's guidelines contributed to valid syntheses of our studies.
本文的目的是反复阐述并讨论在两项关于患者医院过渡体验的定性研究综合分析中,对方法学挑战的处理。我们应用了桑德洛维茨和巴罗索关于定性研究综合分析的指导方针,据我们所知,这是研究人员首次讨论他们的方法学步骤。在此过程中,我们发现需要进行长时间的讨论,以确定对该方法的共同理解。我们讨论了如何识别合适的定性研究文献,以及如何最好地针对我们的目标现象进行详尽的文献检索。另一个发现涉及我们作为参与者体验的三阶解释者的身份,以及这对综合主要研究结果意味着什么。最后,我们讨论了我们的研究是否可以归类为元摘要或元综合分析。尽管我们对该方法的适用性存在一些担忧,但我们得出结论,遵循桑德洛维茨和巴罗索的指导方针有助于对我们的研究进行有效的综合分析。
Qual Health Res. 2016-2
Health Technol Assess. 2011-12
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2025-4-16
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024-11