• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

GoMo研究:一项评估使用Gomco钳与Mogen钳进行包皮环切术时新生儿疼痛情况的随机临床试验。

The GoMo study: a randomized clinical trial assessing neonatal pain with Gomco vs Mogen clamp circumcision.

作者信息

Sinkey Rachel G, Eschenbacher Michaela A, Walsh Peggy M, Doerger Rita G, Lambers Donna S, Sibai Baha M, Habli Mounira A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TriHealth Hospital, Cincinnati, OH.

TriHealth Hatton Research Institute, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):664.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.029
PMID:25794628
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare the pain/stress levels of newborns among the 2 most common circumcision techniques after resident-wide education.

STUDY DESIGN

The study period of this randomized control trial was October 2012 through March 2014. Following informed consent, full-term males from uncomplicated singleton pregnancies were randomized to Gomco (n=137) or Mogen (n=137) devices. Resident-wide education for an obstetrics and gynecology residency program at a single institution was performed to ensure standardized training. All infants received a subcutaneous ring block before the procedure and oral sucrose intraoperatively. The primary outcome was neonatal pain assessed physiologically by salivary cortisol levels (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and clinically by a validated neonatal pain score (crying, requires increased oxygen administration, increased vital signs, expression, sleeplessness [CRIES]). Secondary outcomes were immediate complications, duration of procedure, and short-term outcomes as reported by mothers and pediatricians. A sample size of 274 (accounting for 20% loss of follow-up) was determined sufficient to detect a mean difference of 1.22 μg/dL in cortisol levels (Gomco, SD±3.34; Mogen, SD±0.81) with 80% power, P=.05 level of significance.

RESULTS

A total of 251 infants completed the protocol. There were no significant differences in maternal or neonatal demographics including preoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure. In the Mogen circumcision, the percentage change of cortisol was significantly lower than Gomco (279.1±498.15 vs 167.75±272.22; P=.049). There were no differences in postoperative CRIES scores. Postoperative heart rate was higher in infants undergoing Gomco circumcision than Mogen circumcision (138.7±16.5 vs 133.4±17.5; P=.015) as was mean arterial blood pressure (63.3±9.2 vs 60.4±8.6; P=.012). Mogen circumcisions were shorter (7.00±2.97 vs 3.65±1.84 minutes; P<.001). There were no significant differences in bleeding complications. A total of 168 maternal surveys were completed, with 98.7% maternal satisfaction in Gomco vs 98.9% in Mogen. There were no reports of bleeding after discharge or circumcision revisions in either group to date.

CONCLUSION

Mogen clamp is associated with less neonatal pain physiologically by significantly lower percentage change in salivary cortisol, lower heart rate, and mean arterial blood pressure. There was no difference in CRIES scores. Mogen clamp circumcision duration is significantly shorter than Gomco clamp. Both methods demonstrate satisfactory maternal and pediatrician short-term follow-up.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是比较在全体住院医师接受培训后,两种最常用的包皮环切术对新生儿疼痛/应激水平的影响。

研究设计

这项随机对照试验的研究期为2012年10月至2014年3月。在获得知情同意后,将单胎足月、无并发症妊娠的男性新生儿随机分为使用Gomco器械组(n = 137)和Mogen器械组(n = 137)。对单一机构的妇产科住院医师培训项目进行了全员培训,以确保标准化培训。所有婴儿在手术前接受皮下环形阻滞,并在术中口服蔗糖。主要结局是通过唾液皮质醇水平(酶联免疫吸附测定)进行生理评估以及通过经过验证的新生儿疼痛评分(哭闹、需要增加氧气供应、生命体征增加、表情、失眠[CRIES])进行临床评估的新生儿疼痛。次要结局是即时并发症、手术持续时间以及母亲和儿科医生报告的短期结局。确定样本量为274例(考虑到20%的失访率)足以检测出皮质醇水平平均差异为1.22μg/dL(Gomco组,标准差±3.34;Mogen组,标准差±0.81),检验效能为80%,显著性水平P = 0.05。

结果

共有251名婴儿完成了研究方案。在母亲或新生儿人口统计学特征方面,包括术前心率和平均动脉压,没有显著差异。在使用Mogen包皮环切术中,皮质醇的百分比变化显著低于Gomco组(279.1±498.15对167.75±272.22;P = 0.049)。术后CRIES评分没有差异。接受Gomco包皮环切术的婴儿术后心率高于接受Mogen包皮环切术的婴儿(138.7±16.5对133.4±17.5;P = 0.015),平均动脉血压也是如此(63.3±9.2对60.4±8.6;P = 0.012)。Mogen包皮环切术用时更短(7.00±2.97对3.65±1.84分钟;P < 0.001)。出血并发症没有显著差异。共完成了168份母亲调查问卷,Gomco组母亲满意度为98.7%,Mogen组为98.9%。迄今为止,两组均未报告出院后出血或包皮环切术修正的情况。

结论

Mogen夹在生理上与较少的新生儿疼痛相关,表现为唾液皮质醇百分比变化显著更低、心率和平均动脉血压更低。CRIES评分没有差异。Mogen夹包皮环切术的持续时间显著短于Gomco夹。两种方法在母亲和儿科医生的短期随访中均显示出令人满意的结果。

相似文献

1
The GoMo study: a randomized clinical trial assessing neonatal pain with Gomco vs Mogen clamp circumcision.GoMo研究:一项评估使用Gomco钳与Mogen钳进行包皮环切术时新生儿疼痛情况的随机临床试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):664.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
2
A comparison of the Mogen and Gomco clamps in combination with dorsal penile nerve block in minimizing the pain of neonatal circumcision.比较莫根夹和戈姆科夹联合阴茎背神经阻滞在减轻新生儿包皮环切术疼痛方面的效果。
Pediatrics. 1999 Feb;103(2):E23. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.2.e23.
3
An evaluation of the effects of sucrose on neonatal pain with 2 commonly used circumcision methods.采用两种常用包皮环切术方法评估蔗糖对新生儿疼痛的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;186(3):564-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121621.
4
Gomco Versus Mogen? No Effect on Circumcision Revision Rates.Gomco钳与Mogen钳?对包皮环切术修复率无影响。
Hosp Pediatr. 2018 Oct;8(10):611-614. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0053.
5
Combined analgesia and local anesthesia to minimize pain during circumcision.联合镇痛与局部麻醉以尽量减轻包皮环切术期间的疼痛。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jun;154(6):620-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.6.620.
6
Pain during Mogen or PlastiBell circumcision.莫根式或塑料环包皮环切术期间的疼痛。
J Perinatol. 2002 Apr-May;22(3):214-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210653.
7
A randomized trial of Mogen clamp versus Plastibell for neonatal male circumcision in Botswana.莫根钳与塑胶环法用于博茨瓦纳新生儿男性包皮环切术的随机试验。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Apr 15;62(5):e131-7. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318285d449.
8
Pain management for neonatal circumcision.新生儿包皮环切术的疼痛管理
Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(2):101-11. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200103020-00003.
9
Immediate Complications of Elective Newborn Circumcision.择期新生儿包皮环切术的即刻并发症
Hosp Pediatr. 2018 Oct;8(10):615-619. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0005.
10
Gomco circumcision: When is it safe?戈姆科包皮环切术:何时是安全的?
J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Jul;36(7):1047-9. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.24739.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.婴儿和幼儿操作痛的非药物处理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 14;6(6):CD006275. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006275.pub4.
2
Critical evaluation of contrasting evidence on whether male circumcision has adverse psychological effects: A systematic review.对比男性割礼是否有不良心理影响的证据的批判性评价:系统评价。
J Evid Based Med. 2022 Jun;15(2):123-135. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12482. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
3
Neonatal Infant Pain Scale in assessing pain and pain relief for newborn male circumcision.
新生儿疼痛量表评估新生儿男婴包皮环切术的疼痛和缓解疼痛。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 May;35(3):282-285. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00551-x. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
4
Neonatal male circumcision is associated with altered adult socio-affective processing.新生儿男性包皮环切术与成人社会情感加工的改变有关。
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 26;6(11):e05566. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05566. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
Management of pain in newborn circumcision: a systematic review.新生儿包皮环切术中疼痛的管理:一项系统综述。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Jan;180(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03758-6. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
6
Neonatal circumcision and prematurity are associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).新生儿包皮环切术和早产与婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)有关。
J Clin Transl Res. 2019 Jan 9;4(2):136-151. eCollection 2019 Jan 10.
7
Evidence-Based Identification of Key Beliefs Explaining Infant Male Circumcision Motivation Among Expectant Parents in Zimbabwe: Targets for Behavior Change Messaging.基于证据的津巴布韦准父母对男婴割礼动机的关键信念识别:行为改变信息的目标。
AIDS Behav. 2018 Feb;22(2):479-496. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1796-4.
8
A "Wear and Tear" Hypothesis to Explain Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.一种解释婴儿猝死综合征的“磨损”假说。
Front Neurol. 2016 Oct 28;7:180. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00180. eCollection 2016.
9
The characteristics of circular disposable devices and in situ devices for optimizing male circumcision: a network meta-analysis.优化男性包皮环切术的环形一次性器械和原位器械的特点:一项网状Meta分析。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 9;6:25514. doi: 10.1038/srep25514.