• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导尿管联合米索前列醇与单用米索前列醇用于促宫颈成熟的荟萃分析

Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening.

作者信息

Chen Wenhang, Xue Jing, Gaudet Laura, Walker Mark, Wen Shi Wu

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; OMNI Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

OMNI Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;129(3):193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.005
PMID:25794821
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of Foley catheter plus misoprostol for cervical ripening has not been convincingly shown in trials.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the evidence comparing Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Collaboration databases were searched with the terms "Foley catheter," "misoprostol," "cervical ripening," and "labor induction."

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing the methods of cervical ripening for delivery of a viable fetus were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study characteristics, quality, and outcomes were recorded. Random-effects models were used to combine data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials were included, with 1153 patients overall. In a pooled analysis of seven high-quality studies, the combination group had a decreased time to delivery (mean difference -2.36 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.07 to -0.66; P=0.007). Risk of chorioamnionitis was significantly increased in the combination group (risk ratio [RR] 2.07, 95% CI 1.04-4.13; P=0.04), and that of tachysystole with fetal heart rate changes was decreased (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.91; P=0.02). Frequency of cesarean did not differ (P=0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of Foley catheter and misoprostol results in a reduced time to delivery, a reduced frequency tachysystole with fetal heart rate changes, and an increased incidence of chorioamnionitis.

摘要

背景

在试验中,尚未令人信服地证明使用 Foley 导管联合米索前列醇促进宫颈成熟的有效性。

目的

总结比较 Foley 导管联合米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇促进宫颈成熟的证据。

检索策略

使用“Foley 导管”“米索前列醇”“宫颈成熟”和“引产”等术语检索 Embase、Medline 和 Cochrane 协作数据库。

入选标准

纳入比较用于分娩活胎的宫颈成熟方法的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

记录研究特征、质量和结果。采用随机效应模型合并数据。

主要结果

纳入八项试验,共 1153 例患者。在对七项高质量研究的汇总分析中,联合组的分娩时间缩短(平均差值 -2.36 小时,95% 置信区间 [CI] -4.07 至 -0.66;P = 0.007)。联合组绒毛膜羊膜炎的风险显著增加(风险比 [RR] 2.07,95% CI 1.04 - 4.13;P = 0.04),伴有胎儿心率变化的子宫收缩过速的风险降低(RR 0.58,95% CI 0.38 - 0.91;P = 0.02)。剖宫产频率无差异(P = 0.77)。

结论

Foley 导管与米索前列醇联合使用可缩短分娩时间,降低伴有胎儿心率变化的子宫收缩过速的频率,并增加绒毛膜羊膜炎的发生率。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening.导尿管联合米索前列醇与单用米索前列醇用于促宫颈成熟的荟萃分析
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;129(3):193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
2
Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.宫颈内 Foley 导管联合阴道米索前列醇与单独使用阴道米索前列醇用于宫颈成熟:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 11;17(6):1825. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061825.
3
Maternal and neonatal outcomes with mechanical cervical dilation plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical ripening; a systematic review of literature and metaanalysis.机械性宫颈扩张加米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇用于宫颈成熟的母婴结局:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 May;1(2):101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis. Foley 导尿管联合前列腺素与 Foley 导尿管联合催产素用于宫颈成熟:网状荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):743.e1-743.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 7.
5
Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.米索前列醇联合Foley球囊与单用米索前列醇用于宫颈成熟的比较:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):23-29. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002403.
6
Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.经宫颈 Foley 球囊联合阴道米索前列醇与单纯阴道米索前列醇用于初产妇肥胖患者宫颈成熟的比较:一项多中心、随机、对照有效性试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(S 01):e123-e128. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708805. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.系统评价和网络荟萃分析比较 Foley 导管、米索前列醇和地诺前列酮用于引产时的宫颈成熟。
BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
8
Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.经阴道与经口腔使用米索前列醇联合 Foley 导管用于足月宫颈成熟(BEGIN 试验):一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):524.e1-524.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
9
[Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].[宫颈 Foley 导管与阴道米索前列醇用于宫颈成熟和引产:一项随机临床试验]
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010 Jul;32(7):346-51. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000700007.
10
Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.引产前置宫颈成熟:经宫颈 Foley 导管与阴道内米索前列醇对比
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;25(2):134-9. doi: 10.1080/01443610500040737.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy and safety of oral and vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone on women experiencing labor: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis of 53 randomized controlled trials.口服和阴道给予米索前列醇与地诺前列酮用于分娩妇女的疗效和安全性:53 项随机对照试验的系统评价和更新的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 4;103(40):e39861. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039861.
2
Obesity at term: What to consider? How to deliver?足月时的肥胖:需考虑什么?如何分娩?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):1725-1733. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07354-5. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
3
Labour Induction with Misoprostol in German Obstetric Clinics: What Are the Facts on Such Use?
德国产科诊所使用米索前列醇引产:此类应用的实际情况如何?
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021 Aug;81(8):955-965. doi: 10.1055/a-1538-2200. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial.阴道米索前列醇与经宫颈 Foley 导管用于过期初产妇宫颈成熟:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jul 27;21(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04011-0.
5
Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.宫颈内 Foley 导管联合阴道米索前列醇与单独使用阴道米索前列醇用于宫颈成熟:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 11;17(6):1825. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061825.
6
Controlled Release Dinoprostone Insert and Foley Compared to Foley Alone: A Randomized Pilot Trial.控释地诺前列酮栓剂与单纯 Foley 导管比较:一项随机初步试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(S 01):e57-e63. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705113. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
7
A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix.对宫颈条件不佳的女性,采用三种滴定剂量口服米索前列醇、固定剂量口服米索前列醇以及福莱氏尿管联合羊膜外生理盐水灌注(EASI)三种方法引产的比较。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Oct 28;33:115. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.115. eCollection 2019.
8
A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study.米索前列醇阴道栓剂与米索前列醇阴道片剂用于初产妇引产的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1647-3.