Adams Samantha A, Paul Katharina T, Ketelaars Corry, Robben Paul
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Institute of Health Policy and Management, Postbox 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dutch Health Inspectorate, Postbox 2680, 3500 GR Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Health Policy. 2015 Jun;119(6):821-30. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
This paper examines the use of 'mystery guests' as an instrument for monitoring quality and safety in healthcare. The Dutch Health Inspectorate initiated a mystery guest pilot project in elderly care as a response to political and social pressure. An independent evaluation of this project revealed that the primary goal of this approach--to provide a better view of the exigencies of daily practice in elderly care--was not met. Inspectors did not use the information delivered by the mystery guests because how they evaluated quality and reported findings did not align with practices used by the health inspectorate. Additionally, the inspectors felt that other instruments being developed were more appropriate for providing a better view of practice. While political pressure is important for effecting change in general, the specific instruments to be used for formal supervision of health institutions should be developed and implemented within the organization in accordance with existing standards and approaches. The choice to implement a new supervision instrument, including sending mystery guests into care institutions, should be preceded by an ethical analysis that takes into account the specific context of its use.
本文探讨了利用“神秘访客”作为监测医疗保健质量和安全的一种手段。荷兰卫生监察局在政治和社会压力的推动下,在老年护理领域启动了一个神秘访客试点项目。对该项目的独立评估显示,这种方法的主要目标——更好地了解老年护理日常实践中的紧急情况——并未实现。检查员没有使用神秘访客提供的信息,因为他们评估质量和报告结果的方式与卫生监察局采用的做法不一致。此外,检查员认为正在开发的其他手段更适合于更好地了解实践情况。虽然一般来说政治压力对于推动变革很重要,但用于对卫生机构进行正式监督的具体手段应在组织内部根据现有标准和方法来制定和实施。在选择实施一种新的监督手段,包括派遣神秘访客进入护理机构之前,应该先进行伦理分析,要考虑到其使用的具体背景。