Machanda Zarin, Brazeau Nick F, Bernard Andrew B, Donovan Ronan M, Papakyrikos Amanda M, Wrangham Richard, Smith Tanya M
Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Freelance Nature Photographer, 28 Fithian Avenue, Merchantville, NJ 08109, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2015 May;82:137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
Knowledge of chimpanzee development has played an essential role in our understanding of the evolution of human ontogeny. However, recent studies of wild ape dentitions have cast doubt on the use of developmental standards derived from captive individuals. Others have called into question the use of deceased wild individuals to infer normative development. We conducted a high resolution photographic study of living known-age subadults in the Kanyawara community (Kibale National Park, Uganda) to generate a comprehensive three year record of dental eruption (including tooth emergence ages). These non-invasive data allow comparisons of captive and wild chimpanzees, establish accurate developmental standards for relatively healthy wild individuals, and facilitate direct assessments of primate-wide associations between dental development and life history. Emergence ages in the Kanyawara chimpanzees are very similar to living Gombe chimpanzees, and are broadly comparable to deceased Taï Forest chimpanzees. Early-emerging teeth such as the deciduous dentition and first molar (M1) appear during a time of maternal dependence, and are almost indistinguishable from captive chimpanzee emergence ages, while later forming teeth in the Kanyawara population emerge in the latter half of captive age ranges or beyond. Five juveniles whose lower M1s emerged by or before 3.3 years of age continued to nurse for a year or more beyond M1 emergence, and their mothers showed considerable variation in reproductive rates. The third molars of two adolescent females emerged several months to several years prior to the birth of their first offspring. Given that broad primate-wide relationships between molar emergence and life history do not necessarily hold within this population of chimpanzees, particularly for variables that are reported to be coincident with molar emergence, we suggest that further study is required in order to predict life history variables in hominins or hominoids.
对黑猩猩发育的了解在我们理解人类个体发育的进化过程中发挥了重要作用。然而,最近对野生猿类牙齿的研究对源自圈养个体的发育标准的适用性提出了质疑。其他人则对使用已故野生个体来推断正常发育提出了疑问。我们对卡尼亚瓦拉社区(乌干达基巴莱国家公园)已知年龄的存活亚成年个体进行了高分辨率摄影研究,以生成一份全面的为期三年的牙齿萌出记录(包括牙齿萌出年龄)。这些非侵入性数据有助于比较圈养和野生黑猩猩,为相对健康的野生个体建立准确的发育标准,并便于直接评估整个灵长类动物中牙齿发育与生活史之间的关联。卡尼亚瓦拉黑猩猩的萌出年龄与现存的贡贝黑猩猩非常相似,并且与已故的塔伊森林黑猩猩大致可比。早期萌出的牙齿,如乳牙列和第一磨牙(M1),出现在对母亲依赖的时期,与圈养黑猩猩的萌出年龄几乎没有区别,而卡尼亚瓦拉种群中较晚形成的牙齿则出现在圈养年龄范围的后半段或更晚。五名幼年个体的下M1在3.3岁及之前萌出,在M1萌出后仍继续哺乳一年或更长时间,它们的母亲在繁殖率上表现出相当大的差异。两名青春期雌性的第三磨牙在其第一个后代出生前几个月到几年就已萌出。鉴于在这群黑猩猩中,整个灵长类动物范围内磨牙萌出与生活史之间的广泛关系不一定成立,特别是对于据报道与磨牙萌出同时发生的变量,我们建议需要进一步研究,以便预测人科动物或类人猿的生活史变量。