Witter Sophie, Wurie Haja, Bertone Maria Paola
ReBUILD/IIHD, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, Scotland,
ReBUILD programme, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Freetown, Sierra Leone and.
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Feb;31(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv006. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
There is an acknowledged gap in the literature on the impact of fee exemption policies on health staff, and, conversely, the implications of staffing for fee exemption. This article draws from five research tools used to analyse changing health worker policies and incentives in post-war Sierra Leone to document the effects of the Free Health Care Initiative (FHCI) of 2010 on health workers.Data were collected through document review (57 documents fully reviewed, published and grey); key informant interviews (23 with government, donors, NGO staff and consultants); analysis of human resource data held by the MoHS; in-depth interviews with health workers (23 doctors, nurses, mid-wives and community health officers); and a health worker survey (312 participants, including all main cadres). The article traces the HR reforms which were triggered by the FHCI and evidence of their effects, which include substantial increases in number and pay (particularly for higher cadres), as well as a reported reduction in absenteeism and attrition, and an increase (at least for some areas, where data is available) in outputs per health worker. The findings highlight how a flagship policy, combined with high profile support and financial and technical resources, can galvanize systemic changes. In this regard, the story of Sierra Leone differs from many countries introducing fee exemptions, where fee exemption has been a stand-alone programme, unconnected to wider health system reforms. The challenge will be sustaining the momentum and the attention to delivering results as the FHCI ceases to be an initiative and becomes just 'business as normal'. The health system in Sierra Leone was fragile and conflict-affected prior to the FHCI and still faces significant challenges, both in human resources for health and more widely, as vividly evidenced by the current Ebola crisis.
关于费用豁免政策对卫生工作人员的影响,以及相反,人员配置对费用豁免的影响,文献中存在公认的空白。本文借鉴了用于分析战后塞拉利昂不断变化的卫生工作者政策和激励措施的五种研究工具,以记录2010年免费医疗倡议(FHCI)对卫生工作者的影响。数据通过文件审查(全面审查了57份已发表和灰色文献)、关键信息人访谈(与政府、捐助者、非政府组织工作人员和顾问进行了23次访谈)、对卫生部持有的人力资源数据的分析、对卫生工作者的深入访谈(23名医生、护士、助产士和社区卫生官员)以及一次卫生工作者调查(312名参与者,包括所有主要干部)收集。本文追溯了由免费医疗倡议引发的人力资源改革及其效果的证据,这些效果包括数量和薪酬大幅增加(特别是对高级干部而言),以及据报道旷工和人员流失减少,每名卫生工作者的产出增加(至少在有数据的一些地区)。研究结果突出了一项旗舰政策,加上高调的支持以及财政和技术资源,如何能够激发系统性变革。在这方面,塞拉利昂的情况与许多实行费用豁免的国家不同,在那些国家,费用豁免一直是一个独立的项目,与更广泛的卫生系统改革无关。随着免费医疗倡议不再是一项倡议,而成为“正常业务”,挑战将是保持这一势头并继续关注取得成果。在免费医疗倡议之前,塞拉利昂的卫生系统脆弱且受冲突影响,目前的埃博拉危机生动地证明,该国在卫生人力资源以及更广泛的方面仍然面临重大挑战。