• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格鲁吉亚共和国是如何几乎杜绝使用儿童福利院的。

How the Republic of Georgia has nearly eliminated the use of institutional care for children.

作者信息

Greenberg Aaron Luis, Partskhaladze Natia

机构信息

Unicef.

出版信息

Infant Ment Health J. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):185-91. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21434. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1002/imhj.21434
PMID:25798524
Abstract

Countries throughout Eastern Europe and Central Asia struggle to change their childcare systems from one that is predominantly based on large-institution care to one that has a continuum of services and is family-focused. Georgia has shown, in large part, that the laudable goal of ending large-scale institutions for children is possible, including for children under the age of 6 years. Between 2005 and 2013, the Government in the Republic of Georgia closed 32 large, state-run institutions housing children without adequate family care. Social work was strengthened, a robust program was created to reunite children with their families, a foster care system was put into place and scaled up, and small group homes housing 8 to 10 children were established. What happened in Georgia is unique in the region. The Ukraine, which by many accounts has 100,000 children living in large, Soviet-style orphanages, has struggled to reform its childcare system. It has been estimated by childcare professionals in the Ukraine that institutional care for children accounts for over 1% of the gross domestic product. Romania, which has made considerable progress over the past 10 years, still has over 40,000 children in large-institution care. This article aims to tell how this transformation was accomplished, the conditions in Georgia that made the reform possible, how the institutions were closed, how the alternatives were established, and how sustainable the progress has been.

摘要

东欧和中亚各国都在努力改革其儿童保育系统,从主要基于大型机构照料的模式转变为拥有一系列服务且以家庭为中心的模式。格鲁吉亚在很大程度上表明,终结儿童大型机构照料这一值得称赞的目标是可行的,包括针对6岁以下儿童。2005年至2013年期间,格鲁吉亚共和国政府关闭了32所大型国营机构,这些机构收留了缺乏足够家庭照料的儿童。社会工作得到加强,制定了一项强有力的计划以使儿童与家人团聚,建立并扩大了寄养照料系统,还设立了容纳8至10名儿童的小型集体之家。格鲁吉亚发生的情况在该地区是独一无二的。据多方说法,乌克兰有10万名儿童生活在大型的苏联式孤儿院中,该国一直在努力改革其儿童保育系统。乌克兰的儿童保育专业人员估计,儿童机构照料占国内生产总值的1%以上。罗马尼亚在过去10年取得了相当大的进展,但仍有4万多名儿童在大型机构中接受照料。本文旨在讲述这一转变是如何实现的,格鲁吉亚促成改革的条件,机构是如何关闭的,替代照料模式是如何建立的,以及所取得的进展的可持续性如何。

相似文献

1
How the Republic of Georgia has nearly eliminated the use of institutional care for children.格鲁吉亚共和国是如何几乎杜绝使用儿童福利院的。
Infant Ment Health J. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):185-91. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21434. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
2
Health of children adopted from Guatemala: comparison of orphanage and foster care.从危地马拉收养儿童的健康状况:孤儿院照料与寄养照料的比较
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e710-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2359.
3
Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: the Bucharest Early Intervention Project.社会剥夺环境下幼儿的认知恢复:布加勒斯特早期干预项目
Science. 2007 Dec 21;318(5858):1937-40. doi: 10.1126/science.1143921.
4
[Mental and behavior disorders in children placed in long term care institutions in Hunedoara, Cluj and Timis, Romania].[罗马尼亚胡内多阿拉、克卢日和蒂米什长期护理机构中儿童的精神和行为障碍]
Sante. 2001 Jan-Feb;11(1):5-12.
5
Institutional rearing and psychiatric disorders in Romanian preschool children.罗马尼亚学龄前儿童的机构抚养与精神疾病
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;166(7):777-85. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08091438. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
6
Who will care for me? The debate of orphanages versus foster care.谁会照顾我?孤儿院与寄养照料的争论。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2006 May;7(2):142-8. doi: 10.1177/1527154406291104.
7
From institutional care to family support: development of an effective early intervention network in the Nizhny Novgorod Region, Russian Federation, to support family care for children at risk for institutionalization.从机构照料到家庭支持:俄罗斯联邦下诺夫哥罗德地区建立有效的早期干预网络,以支持对有被机构收容风险儿童的家庭照料
Infant Ment Health J. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):172-84. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21433. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
8
Forgotten children? An update on young children in institutions across Europe.被遗忘的儿童?欧洲各机构中幼儿的最新情况。
Early Hum Dev. 2012 Dec;88(12):911-4. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.09.018. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
9
[Attachment and child development in a residential institution in Kinshasa].[金沙萨一家寄宿机构中的依恋与儿童发展]
Arch Pediatr. 2014 Nov;21(11):1159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2014.08.037. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
10
Pre-placement screening in international adoption.国际收养中的安置前筛查。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Nov;5(11):763-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child and the European Child Guarantee-Evidence-Based Recommendations for Alternative Care.欧盟儿童权利战略与欧洲儿童保障——替代照料的循证建议
Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 14;8(12):1181. doi: 10.3390/children8121181.
2
Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children 2: policy and practice recommendations for global, national, and local actors.儿童的机构收容与非机构收容2:针对全球、国家及地方行为体的政策与实践建议
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Aug;4(8):606-633. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30060-2. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Early Caregiver-Child Interaction and Children's Development: Lessons from the St. Petersburg-USA Orphanage Intervention Research Project.
早期照料者-儿童互动与儿童发展:圣彼得堡-美国孤儿院干预研究项目的经验教训。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2019 Jun;22(2):208-224. doi: 10.1007/s10567-018-0270-9.
4
CAREGIVER SENSITIVITY AND CONSISTENCY AND CHILDREN'S PRIOR FAMILY EXPERIENCE AS CONTEXTS FOR EARLY DEVELOPMENT WITHIN INSTITUTIONS.照顾者的敏感性与一致性以及儿童先前的家庭经历作为机构内早期发展的背景因素
Infant Ment Health J. 2018 Jul;39(4):432-448. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21721. Epub 2018 Jun 28.