Hu Sishun, Hosey Kristen L, Derbigny Wilbert A
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America; College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0119235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119235. eCollection 2015.
We previously reported that the IFN-β secreted by Chlamydia muridarum-infected murine oviduct epithelial cells (OE cells) was mostly dependent on the TLR3 signaling pathway. To further characterize the mechanisms of IFN-β synthesis during Chlamydia infection of OE cells in vitro, we utilized specific inhibitory drugs to clarify the roles of IRF3 and NF-κB on both early- and late-phase C. muridarum infections. Our results showed that the pathways involved in the early-phase of IFN-β production were distinct from that in the late-phase of IFN-β production. Disruption of IRF3 activation using an inhibitor of TBK-1 at early-phase Chlamydia infection had a significant impact on the overall synthesis of IFN-β; however, disruption of IRF3 activation at late times during infection had no effect. Interestingly, inhibition of NF-κB early during Chlamydia infection also had a negative effect on IFN-β production; however, its impact was not significant. Our data show that the transcription factor IRF7 was induced late during Chlamydia infection, which is indicative of a positive feedback mechanism of IFN-β synthesis late during infection. In contrast, IRF7 appears to play little or no role in the early synthesis of IFN-β during Chlamydia infection. Finally, we demonstrate that antibiotics that target chlamydial DNA replication are much more effective at reducing IFN-β synthesis during infection versus antibiotics that target chlamydial transcription. These results provide evidence that early- and late-phase IFN-β production have distinct signaling pathways in Chlamydia-infected OE cells, and suggest that Chlamydia DNA replication might provide a link to the currently unknown chlamydial PAMP for TLR3.
我们之前报道过,鼠衣原体感染的小鼠输卵管上皮细胞(OE细胞)分泌的IFN-β大多依赖于TLR3信号通路。为了进一步阐明体外衣原体感染OE细胞期间IFN-β合成的机制,我们使用特异性抑制药物来明确IRF3和NF-κB在鼠衣原体感染早期和晚期的作用。我们的结果表明,IFN-β产生早期所涉及的信号通路与晚期不同。在衣原体感染早期使用TBK-1抑制剂破坏IRF3激活,对IFN-β的整体合成有显著影响;然而,在感染后期破坏IRF3激活则没有效果。有趣的是,在衣原体感染早期抑制NF-κB对IFN-β的产生也有负面影响;然而,其影响并不显著。我们的数据表明,转录因子IRF7在衣原体感染后期被诱导,这表明感染后期IFN-β合成存在正反馈机制。相比之下,IRF7在衣原体感染期间IFN-β的早期合成中似乎作用很小或没有作用。最后,我们证明,与靶向衣原体转录的抗生素相比,靶向衣原体DNA复制的抗生素在感染期间减少IFN-β合成方面更有效。这些结果证明,在衣原体感染的OE细胞中,IFN-β产生的早期和晚期具有不同的信号通路,并表明衣原体DNA复制可能为目前未知的衣原体TLR3配体提供联系。