Habib Mohamed, Serhan Hassan, Marchek Connie, Baroud Gamal
Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Depuy Spine, Raynham, MA.
SAS J. 2010 Mar 1;4(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.001. eCollection 2010.
Vertebral augmentation has recently evolved as a medical procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, the most common type of skeletal fractures related to osteoporosis.
This study compared the cement leakage and filling behavior of 2 existing delivery systems (Confidence and Vertebroplastic; DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA). The Confidence system with the high viscosity cement has been recently introduced in an attempt to curtail cement leakage.
The comparison was performed using an established benchmark model wherein the cement leakage, filling behavior can be assessed. A double-conduit introducer needle was used to deliver the cement and to measure the intravertebral pressure while delivering the cement. There were 5 experimental groups in this study: 3 low-viscosity groups, whose cement was injected at 3.5, 6.5, and 9.5 minutes after admixing the powder and monomer, and 2 high-viscosity groups injected at 3.5 and 6.5 minutes. The mass of leaked cement generally decreased with delaying the start of the injection. Specifically, for the low-viscosity, the average smallest leakage mass obtained was 2.6 ± 1.2g when the cement was delivered at 9.5 minutes. If delivered after 3.5 minutes, the mass of cement leak was 4.0 ± 1.2g. The high-viscosity system has showed improved results in curtailing cement leakage, as compared to low-viscosity. Specifically, if injected after 3.5 and 6.5 minutes, the cement leakage amounts were 1.5 ± 1.2g and 0.92 ± 0.6g, respectively. Similarly, the uniformity of cement filling increased when the delivery was delayed and when the high-viscosity system was applied. Furthermore, there were no significance changes in the intravertebral pressures between the low- and high-viscous groups. No correlation between the leakage mass and the IV pressures was noted.
The cement thickness and timing of delivery are key in controlling the intravertebral cement filling and physician may want to explore the use of low- or high-viscous cement for different fractures. The thickness of the cement has no significant impact on the intravertebral pressures.
椎体强化术最近已发展成为一种治疗椎体压缩骨折的医疗程序,椎体压缩骨折是与骨质疏松症相关的最常见的骨骼骨折类型。
本研究比较了2种现有输送系统(Confidence和Vertebroplastic;DePuy Spine,Raynham,马萨诸塞州)的骨水泥渗漏和填充情况。最近推出了具有高粘度骨水泥的Confidence系统,试图减少骨水泥渗漏。
使用已建立的基准模型进行比较,在该模型中可以评估骨水泥渗漏和填充情况。使用双导管导入针输送骨水泥,并在输送骨水泥时测量椎体内压力。本研究有5个实验组:3个低粘度组,其骨水泥在混合粉末和单体后3.5、6.5和9.5分钟注射,以及2个高粘度组在3.5和6.5分钟注射。随着注射开始时间的延迟,渗漏骨水泥的量通常会减少。具体而言,对于低粘度组,当骨水泥在9.5分钟输送时,获得的平均最小渗漏量为2.6±1.2g。如果在3.5分钟后输送,则骨水泥渗漏量为4.0±1.2g。与低粘度系统相比,高粘度系统在减少骨水泥渗漏方面显示出更好的效果。具体而言,如果在3.5和6.5分钟后注射,骨水泥渗漏量分别为1.5±1.2g和0.92±0.6g。同样,当延迟输送并应用高粘度系统时,骨水泥填充的均匀性增加。此外,低粘度组和高粘度组之间的椎体内压力没有显著变化。未发现渗漏量与椎体内压力之间存在相关性。
骨水泥厚度和输送时间是控制椎体内骨水泥填充的关键,医生可能需要探索针对不同骨折使用低粘度或高粘度骨水泥。骨水泥厚度对椎体内压力没有显著影响。