Suppr超能文献

经皮椎体成形术联合高黏度骨水泥治疗重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的作用。

Role of percutaneous vertebroplasty with high-viscosity cement in the treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Liaocheng People's Hospital, No 67 Dongchang West Road, Liaocheng City, 252000, Shandong Province, China.

Department of Ultrasonography, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng City, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84314-6.

Abstract

Severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) were considered as relative or even absolute contraindication for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty and these relevant reports are very limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of vertebroplasty with high-viscosity cement and conventional kyphoplasty in managing severe OVCFs. 37 patients of severe OVCFs experiencing vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty were reviewed and divided into two groups, according to the procedural technique, 18 in high-viscosity cement percutaneous vertebroplasty (hPVP) group and 19 in conventional percutaneous kyphoplasty (cPKP) group. The operative time, and injected bone cement volume were recorded. Anterior vertebral height (AVH), Cobb angle and cement leakage were also evaluated in the radiograph. The rate of cement leakage was lower in hPVP group, compared with cPKP group (16.7% vs 47.4%, P = 0.046). The patients in cPKP group achieved more improvement in AVH and Cobb angle than those in hPVP group postoperatively (37.2 ± 7.9% vs 43.0 ± 8.9% for AVH, P = 0.044; 15.5 ± 4.7 vs 12.7 ± 3.3, for Cobb angle, P = 0.042). At one year postoperatively, there was difference observed in AVH between two groups (34.1 ± 7.4 vs 40.5 ± 8.7 for hPVP and cPKP groups, P = 0.021), but no difference was found in Cobb angle (16.6 ± 5.0 vs 13.8 ± 3.8, P = 0.068). Similar cement volume was injected in two groups (2.9 ± 0.5 ml vs 2.8 ± 0.6 ml, P = 0.511). However, the operative time was 37.8 ± 6.8 min in the hPVP group, which was shorter than that in the cPKP group (43.8 ± 8.2 min, P = 0.021). In conclusion, conventional PKP achieved better in restoring anterior vertebral height and improving kyphotic angle, but PVP with high-viscosity cement had lower rate of cement leakage and shorter operative time with similar volume of injected cement.

摘要

严重骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)被认为是经皮椎体成形术(PVP)和经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术(PKP)的相对甚至绝对禁忌证,相关报道非常有限。本研究旨在评估和比较高黏度骨水泥 PVP 和传统 PKP 治疗严重 OVCFs 的疗效。回顾性分析了 37 例接受 PVP 或 PKP 治疗的严重 OVCFs 患者,根据手术技术将其分为两组,18 例患者接受高黏度骨水泥经皮椎体成形术(hPVP),19 例患者接受传统 PKP(cPKP)。记录手术时间和注入骨水泥的体积。通过 X 线评估椎体前缘高度(AVH)、Cobb 角和骨水泥渗漏。与 cPKP 组相比,hPVP 组骨水泥渗漏率较低(16.7% vs 47.4%,P=0.046)。与 hPVP 组相比,cPKP 组术后 AVH 和 Cobb 角改善更明显(AVH:37.2±7.9% vs 43.0±8.9%,P=0.044;Cobb 角:15.5±4.7% vs 12.7±3.3%,P=0.042)。术后 1 年,两组间 AVH 存在差异(hPVP 组和 cPKP 组分别为 34.1±7.4%和 40.5±8.7%,P=0.021),但 Cobb 角无差异(16.6±5.0% vs 13.8±3.8%,P=0.068)。两组骨水泥注射量相似(2.9±0.5ml vs 2.8±0.6ml,P=0.511)。然而,hPVP 组的手术时间为 37.8±6.8min,短于 cPKP 组(43.8±8.2min,P=0.021)。综上所述,传统 PKP 在恢复椎体前缘高度和改善后凸角方面更具优势,但高黏度骨水泥 PVP 具有较低的骨水泥渗漏率和较短的手术时间,且注入的骨水泥量相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e33/7907187/cc9b7794606f/41598_2021_84314_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验