Suppr超能文献

急性胰腺炎的诊断检测。敏感性和特异性研究。

Diagnostic assays in acute pancreatitis. A study of sensitivity and specificity.

作者信息

Steinberg W M, Goldstein S S, Davis N D, Shamma'a J, Anderson K

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1985 May;102(5):576-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-5-576.

Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of five assays used to diagnose acute pancreatitis were studied: two amylase assays; one lipase; one trypsinogen; and one pancreatic isoamylase. Thirty-nine patients with acute pancreatitis were compared to 127 controls with abdominal pain. Using the upper limit of normal both amylase assays appeared sensitive but somewhat nonspecific (specificities of 88.9% and 86%, respectively). The trypsinogen and pancreatic isoamylase assays were also relatively nonspecific (specificity of 82.8% and 85.1%). Most nonspecific elevations occurred between a one- and twofold elevation of each assay. Lipase, however, maintained excellent specificity (99%) at its upper limit of normal. If the level of best cutoff is used instead (the level that best enhances sensitivity and specificity), the specificities of both amylase assays, as well as the trypsinogen and pancreatic isoamylase assays, exceed 95%. At the best cutoff level, trypsinogen maintains a qualitative advantage in sensitivity over lipase or pancreatic isoamylase (97.4% as compared to 86.5% and 84.6%).

摘要

对用于诊断急性胰腺炎的五种检测方法的敏感性和特异性进行了研究

两种淀粉酶检测方法;一种脂肪酶检测方法;一种胰蛋白酶原检测方法;以及一种胰腺同工淀粉酶检测方法。将39例急性胰腺炎患者与127例腹痛对照者进行了比较。使用正常上限时,两种淀粉酶检测方法似乎都很敏感,但特异性稍低(特异性分别为88.9%和86%)。胰蛋白酶原和胰腺同工淀粉酶检测方法的特异性也相对较低(特异性分别为82.8%和85.1%)。大多数非特异性升高发生在每种检测方法升高1至2倍之间。然而,脂肪酶在其正常上限时保持了出色的特异性(99%)。如果改用最佳临界值水平(能最佳提高敏感性和特异性的水平),两种淀粉酶检测方法以及胰蛋白酶原和胰腺同工淀粉酶检测方法的特异性均超过95%。在最佳临界值水平时,胰蛋白酶原在敏感性方面相对于脂肪酶或胰腺同工淀粉酶具有质量优势(分别为97.4%,而脂肪酶和胰腺同工淀粉酶分别为86.5%和84.6%)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验