Kwon Hyo Jin, Lee Young-Mee, Lee Young Hee
Department of Medical Education, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Med Educ. 2013 Sep;25(3):211-20. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2013.25.3.211. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
Identifying medical students' perceptions of and experiences with unprofessional behavior in school can help them develop and maintain higher standards of professional ethics. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument that assesses medical students' attitudes toward academic misconduct.
A draft version of the questionnaire form was developed, based on an extensive literature review and iterative discussions. The validity of the content of this draft form was evaluated by medical students, physicians, and education specialists. A total of 803 medical students answered the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using principal axis factoring and Varimax rotation. A confirmatory factor analysis was also conducted by root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit index (CFI). The internal consistency of the scales was calculated using the Cronbach alpha statistic.
The exploratory factor analysis generated 6 factors with 29 items: scientific misconduct (8 items); irresponsibility in the class (6 items); disrespectful behavior in patient care (5 items); dishonesty in clerkship tasks (4 items); free-riding on group assignments (4 items); and irresponsibility during clerkship (2 items). After adding a single item that addressed cheating on examinations, a 30-item inventory was developed. A confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a favorable RMSEA (0.082) and reasonable fit (CFI, 0.844). The coefficient alpha for each factor varied between 0.80 and 0.90.
Our instrument is useful in identifying students' ethical standards with regard to academics and examining the prevalence of unprofessional behavior in medical students.
了解医学生对学校中不专业行为的看法和经历,有助于他们培养和维持更高的职业道德标准。本研究的目的是开发一种评估医学生对学术不端行为态度的工具。
基于广泛的文献综述和反复讨论,制定了问卷初稿。医学生、医生和教育专家对该初稿内容的有效性进行了评估。共有803名医学生回答了问卷。使用主轴因子分析和方差最大化旋转进行探索性因子分析。还通过近似均方根误差(RMSEA)和比较拟合指数(CFI)进行了验证性因子分析。使用克朗巴赫α统计量计算量表的内部一致性。
探索性因子分析产生了6个因子,共29个项目:科学不端行为(8个项目);课堂上的不负责任行为(6个项目);患者护理中的不尊重行为(5个项目);临床实习任务中的不诚实行为(4个项目);小组作业中的搭便车行为(4个项目);以及临床实习期间的不负责任行为(2个项目)。在增加一个关于考试作弊的单项后,形成了一个30项的量表。验证性因子分析显示RMSEA良好(0.082)且拟合合理(CFI,0.844)。每个因子的α系数在0.80至0.90之间。
我们的工具有助于识别学生在学术方面的道德标准,并考察医学生中不专业行为的普遍程度。