Ahlawat Shivani, Khandheria Paras, Subhawong Ty K, Fayad Laura M
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore MD 21287, United States.
Department of Radiology (R-109), University of Miami Leonard M. Miller Miami, FL 33101, United States.
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jun;84(6):1091-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.019. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
To investigate the accuracy of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping for characterizing bone lesions as benign or malignant.
At 3T, 31 subjects with intramedullary lesions imaged by DWI (b-values 50, 400, 800s/mm(2)) were included. ADC values (minimum, mean, maximum) were recorded by three observers independently. Interobserver variability and differences between ADC values in benign and malignant lesions were assessed (unpaired t-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis).
Of 31 lesions, 18 were benign (osteoblastic (n=1), chondroid (n=6), cysts (n=4), hemangiomatosis (n=1), fibrous (n=3), eosinophilic granuloma (n=1), giant cell tumor (n=1), osteomyelitis (n=1)) and 13 were malignant (primary (n=5), metastases (n=8)). Overall, there were higher minimum (1.27 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s vs 0.68 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s, p<0.001), mean (1.68 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s vs 1.13 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s, p<0.001), and maximum (2.09 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s vs 1. 7 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s, p=0.03). ADC values in benign lesions compared with those in malignancies. ROC analysis revealed areas under the curve for minimum, mean, and maximum ADC values of 0.91, 0.85, and 0.71, respectively. ADC measurements were made with high inter-observer concordance (ρ=0.83-0.96).
Quantitative ADC maps may have predictive value for the characterization of bone lesions. Benign lesions generally have higher minimum, mean, and maximum ADC values than malignancies, with the minimum value offering the highest accuracy for characterization.
探讨采用表观扩散系数(ADC)图的定量扩散加权成像在鉴别骨病变为良性或恶性方面的准确性。
纳入31例在3T磁共振成像下行弥散加权成像(DWI,b值分别为50、400、800s/mm²)的髓内病变患者。由三名观察者独立记录ADC值(最小值、平均值、最大值)。评估观察者间的变异性以及良性和恶性病变ADC值之间的差异(非配对t检验、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析)。
31例病变中,18例为良性(成骨细胞性(n = 1)、软骨样(n = 6)、囊肿(n = 4)、血管瘤病(n = 1)、纤维性(n = 3)、嗜酸性肉芽肿(n = 1)、骨巨细胞瘤(n = 1)、骨髓炎(n = 1)),13例为恶性(原发性(n = 5)转移瘤(n = 8))。总体而言,良性病变的最小ADC值(1.27×10⁻³mm²/s vs 0.68×10⁻³mm²/s,p<0.001)、平均ADC值(1.68×10⁻³mm²/s vs 1.13×10⁻³mm²/s,p<0.001)和最大ADC值(2.09×10⁻³mm²/s vs 1.7×10⁻³mm²/s,p = 0.03)均高于恶性病变。良性病变的ADC值与恶性病变相比。ROC分析显示,最小、平均和最大ADC值的曲线下面积分别为0.91、0.85和0.71。ADC测量的观察者间一致性较高(ρ = 0.83 - 0.96)。
定量ADC图可能对骨病变的鉴别具有预测价值。良性病变的最小ADC值及平均、最大ADC值通常高于恶性病变,其中最小值在鉴别诊断中准确性最高。