Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75022, USA.
Radiology, University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Skeletal Radiol. 2023 Aug;52(8):1475-1484. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04289-5. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
To identify trends in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with respect to tumor type classification and other tumor characteristics whether common malignant soft tissue tumors can be distinguished.
A consecutive series of extremity malignant soft tissue tumors and soft tissue sarcomas (STS) among 78 adult patients with conventional MRI and DWI were included. Each case was evaluated with respect to T1/T2 signal alterations and heterogeneity, presence of peritumoral edema, necrosis, cystic changes, internal hemorrhage, and maximum longitudinal dimension blinded to the histology. The ADC mean and minimum were obtained using a free-hand region of interest of the whole tumor and the darkest (lowest signal area) ADC area of the tumor. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Tests were used to determine associations and significance between tumor subtypes. Intraclass correlation (ICC) and kappa calculations were utilized to assess inter-reader agreements for ADC values and reader diagnosis.
Liposarcomas showed more heterogenous T1W images with hyperintense T1W signal when compared to tumors not classified as liposarcoma (P = 0.046 and P = 0.010, respectively). Liposarcomas were relatively consistent in demonstrating an absence of hemorrhage (81.8%) while undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas consistently showed intralesional hemorrhage (90%). When comparing individual tumor classifications against the rest of the samples, lymphomas registered lower mean and minimum ADC values in the whole tumor and in the most hypointense area of the tumor for both readers (P < 0.05). The interobserver agreement between the two readers was good to excellent for all four ADC measurements (ICC = 0.65-0.98).
Diffusion-weighted imaging generated ADC measurements are reproducible but currently offer limited insight in being able to differentiate among different malignant soft tissue tumor and sarcoma histologies. T1W and T2W signal characteristics also offer limited insight in differentiating between soft tissue malignancies.
从弥散加权成像(DWI)的表观扩散系数(ADC)测量值中确定肿瘤类型分类和其他肿瘤特征的趋势,以确定是否可以区分常见的恶性软组织肿瘤。
连续系列的 78 例成人肢体恶性软组织肿瘤和软组织肉瘤(STS),这些患者均进行了常规 MRI 和 DWI 检查。每例病例均根据 T1/T2 信号改变和异质性、肿瘤周围水肿、坏死、囊性变、内出血和最大纵向尺寸进行评估,这些评估均在不了解组织学的情况下进行。ADC 的平均值和最小值是使用整个肿瘤的自由手 ROI 和肿瘤的最暗(最低信号区域)ADC 区域获得的。Kruskal-Wallis 和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验用于确定肿瘤亚型之间的关联和显著性。使用组内相关(ICC)和kappa 计算评估 ADC 值和读者诊断的读者间一致性。
与未分类为脂肪肉瘤的肿瘤相比,脂肪肉瘤的 T1W 图像表现出更多的异质性,并且具有高信号 T1W 信号(P=0.046 和 P=0.010)。脂肪肉瘤在显示无出血方面相对一致(81.8%),而未分化多形性肉瘤始终显示肿瘤内出血(90%)。当将个别肿瘤分类与其余样本进行比较时,淋巴瘤在两位读者的整个肿瘤和肿瘤最暗区域的平均和最小 ADC 值均较低(P<0.05)。两位读者之间的观察者间一致性对于所有四个 ADC 测量值都很好到极好(ICC=0.65-0.98)。
弥散加权成像生成的 ADC 测量值是可重复的,但目前在区分不同的恶性软组织肿瘤和肉瘤组织学方面提供的信息有限。T1W 和 T2W 信号特征在区分软组织恶性肿瘤方面也提供了有限的信息。