Mobarak E H, Ali N, Daifalla L E
Oper Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;40(5):E180-8. doi: 10.2341/13-220-L. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
This study was carried out to evaluate the difference between bonding to demineralized enamel and remineralized enamel using casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate with fluoride (CPP-ACFP) or without fluoride (CPP-ACP) compared to normal enamel. Another aim was to test if the newly introduced Single Bond Universal adhesive system would show better bonding to any enamel condition in comparison to the other tested adhesive systems.
The lingual enamel surfaces of 40 non carious human third molars were divided into four main groups according to the enamel condition (ground normal enamel [negative control]; demineralized enamel [positive control]; and remineralized enamel with CPP-ACP or with CPP-ACFP, respectively). Within each main group, the lingual enamel surface of each tooth was sectioned into three slabs, resulting in 30 slabs that were distributed into three subgroups according to the adhesive system utilized (Clearfil S(3) Bond Plus, Single Bond Universal, or G-aenial Bond). Two resin composite microcylinder buildups were made on each enamel slab using Filtek Z350 XT. The μSBS was evaluated at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Modes of failure were detected using an environmental scanning electron microscope at 300× magnification.
The two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed a significant effect for the enamel condition. However, there was no significant effect for the type of adhesive system. The interaction between the enamel condition and the type of adhesive system was also not significant. Modes of failure were mainly adhesive except for the demineralized enamel. It showed a mixed type of failure, in which cohesive failure in enamel was recorded.
All single-step self-etch adhesives revealed comparable μSBS values to ground enamel and enamel remineralized with CPP-ACP or CPP-ACFP. Bonding to demineralized enamel was ineffective. With any enamel condition, no tested single-step self-etch adhesive was superior in its bonding.
本研究旨在评估与正常牙釉质相比,使用含氟酪蛋白磷酸肽 - 无定形磷酸钙(CPP - ACFP)或不含氟的酪蛋白磷酸肽 - 无定形磷酸钙(CPP - ACP)与脱矿牙釉质和再矿化牙釉质粘结的差异。另一个目的是测试新推出的单键通用粘结系统与其他测试粘结系统相比,是否对任何牙釉质状况都表现出更好的粘结效果。
根据牙釉质状况(磨除的正常牙釉质[阴性对照];脱矿牙釉质[阳性对照];分别用CPP - ACP或CPP - ACFP再矿化的牙釉质),将40颗无龋人类第三磨牙的舌面牙釉质表面分为四个主要组。在每个主要组内,将每颗牙齿的舌面牙釉质表面切成三个薄片,得到30个薄片,根据所使用的粘结系统(Clearfil S(3) Bond Plus、单键通用或G - aenial Bond)将其分为三个亚组。使用Filtek Z350 XT在每个牙釉质薄片上制作两个树脂复合微圆柱体堆积。在0.5 mm/min的十字头速度下评估微拉伸粘结强度(μSBS)。使用环境扫描电子显微镜在300倍放大倍数下检测断裂模式。
重复测量的双向方差分析显示牙釉质状况有显著影响。然而,粘结系统类型没有显著影响。牙釉质状况和粘结系统类型之间的相互作用也不显著。除脱矿牙釉质外,断裂模式主要为粘结性。它显示出一种混合类型的断裂,其中记录到牙釉质内的内聚性断裂。
所有单步自酸蚀粘结剂显示出与磨除的牙釉质以及用CPP - ACP或CPP - ACFP再矿化的牙釉质相当的μSBS值。与脱矿牙釉质的粘结效果不佳。在任何牙釉质状况下,没有一种测试的单步自酸蚀粘结剂在粘结方面具有优越性。