Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Turkey.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6843-6855. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03972-y. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
This study aimed to assess the effect of application time on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of three universal adhesives in demineralized and sound enamel before and after aging.
Bovine teeth (192) were prepared where buccal surfaces were ground and divided into two groups (sound enamel and demineralized enamel). The specimens in each group were divided into 12 subgroups by combining 3 adhesive agents (All-Bond Universal, Scotchbond Universal, and Tokuyama Universal Bond) × 4 adhesion strategy. Each adhesive was applied with either prolonged (PA) or reduced (RA) application time in etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode. Bonded composites were subjected to μSBS testing after 24-h or 2-year water storage. The results were evaluated using four-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05).
The μSBS of adhesives to sound enamel in both etching modes was mostly similar to demineralized enamel, regardless of application time and aging time. At 24-h, all adhesives with PA in self-etch mode showed higher μSBS when compared with RA, except Tokuyama Universal Bond, but after 2-year aging, no significant difference was found in μSBS between RA and PA. The μSBS of adhesives with PA in etch-and-rinse mode depended on used adhesive and enamel condition compared to RA, regardless of μSBS testing time.
PA of adhesives did not reveal a significant difference in μSBS to enamel, regardless of substrate type and etching mode.
After 2-year aging, the bond strength of universal adhesives presented no significant difference between PA and RA treatments.
本研究旨在评估在老化前后,三种通用型粘结剂在脱矿和正常牙釉质上的应用时间对微剪切粘结强度(μSBS)的影响。
共制备了 192 颗牛牙,其中颊面进行了研磨,并将样本分为两组(正常牙釉质和脱矿牙釉质)。每组样本根据 3 种粘结剂(All-Bond Universal、Scotchbond Universal 和 Tokuyama Universal Bond)×4 种粘结策略进行组合,进一步分为 12 个亚组。每种粘结剂分别采用延长(PA)或缩短(RA)应用时间,在酸蚀-冲洗或自酸蚀模式下进行应用。在 24 小时或 2 年水储存后,对粘结复合材料进行 μSBS 测试。采用四因素方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验(α=0.05)对结果进行评估。
无论应用时间和老化时间如何,在酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀模式下,正常牙釉质的粘结剂 μSBS 与脱矿牙釉质的粘结剂 μSBS 大多相似。在 24 小时时,除了 Tokuyama Universal Bond 之外,所有采用自酸蚀模式的 PA 粘结剂的 μSBS 均高于 RA,但在 2 年老化后,RA 和 PA 之间的 μSBS 无显著差异。在酸蚀-冲洗模式下,采用 PA 的粘结剂的 μSBS 取决于所使用的粘结剂和牙釉质状况,而与 RA 相比则无显著差异,无论 μSBS 测试时间如何。
无论基底类型和酸蚀模式如何,采用 PA 处理的粘结剂对牙釉质的 μSBS 均无显著差异。
在 2 年老化后,通用粘结剂的 PA 和 RA 处理之间的粘结强度无显著差异。