Hallgren Kevin A, McCrady Barbara S
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Fam Process. 2016 Mar;55(1):62-78. doi: 10.1111/famp.12150. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
Couple-based treatments for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) produce higher rates of abstinence than individual-based treatments and posit that active involvement of both identified patients (IPs) and significant others (SOs) is partly responsible for these improvements. Separate research on couples' communication has suggested that pronoun usage can indicate a communal approach to coping with health-related problems. The present study tested whether communal coping, indicated by use of more first-person plural pronouns ("we" language), fewer second-person pronouns ("you" language), and fewer first-person singular pronouns ("I" language), predicted improvements in abstinence in couple-based AUD treatment. Pronoun use was measured in first- and mid-treatment sessions for 188 heterosexual couples in four clinical trials of alcohol behavioral couple therapy (ABCT). Percentages of days abstinent were assessed during treatment and over a 6-month follow-up period. Greater IP and SO "we" language during both sessions was correlated with greater improvement in abstinent days during treatment. Greater SO "we" language during first- and mid-treatment sessions was correlated with greater improvement in abstinence at follow-up. Greater use of IP and SO "you" and "I" language had mixed correlations with abstinence, typically being unrelated to or predicting less improvement in abstinence. When all pronoun variables were entered into regression models, only greater IP "we" langue and lower IP "you" language predicted improvements in abstinence during treatment, and only SO "we" language predicted improvements during follow-up. Most pronoun categories had little or no association with baseline relationship distress. Results suggest that communal coping predicts better abstinence outcomes in couple-based AUD treatment.
针对酒精使用障碍(AUDs)的夫妻治疗比个体治疗产生更高的戒酒率,并认为确诊患者(IPs)和重要他人(SOs)的积极参与是这些改善的部分原因。关于夫妻沟通的单独研究表明,代词的使用可以表明应对健康相关问题的共同方式。本研究测试了以使用更多第一人称复数代词(“我们”语言)、更少第二人称代词(“你”语言)和更少第一人称单数代词(“我”语言)为指标的共同应对方式,是否能预测基于夫妻的酒精使用障碍治疗中戒酒情况的改善。在四项酒精行为夫妻治疗(ABCT)临床试验中,对188对异性恋夫妻在治疗初期和中期的代词使用情况进行了测量。在治疗期间和6个月的随访期内评估戒酒天数的百分比。在两个阶段中,IP和SO更多地使用“我们”语言与治疗期间戒酒天数的更大改善相关。在治疗初期和中期,SO更多地使用“我们”语言与随访期内戒酒情况的更大改善相关。IP和SO更多地使用 “你” 和 “我” 语言与戒酒情况的相关性不一,通常与戒酒情况无关或预示着戒酒情况改善较少。当所有代词变量都纳入回归模型时,只有IP更多地使用“我们”语言和更少地使用“你”语言能预测治疗期间戒酒情况的改善,只有SO使用“我们”语言能预测随访期间的改善。大多数代词类别与基线关系困扰几乎没有关联或没有关联。结果表明,共同应对方式能预测基于夫妻的酒精使用障碍治疗中更好的戒酒结果。