Bradford Angela B, Hawkins Alan J, Acker Jennifer
School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
The Parenting Center, Forth Worth, TX.
Fam Process. 2015 Dec;54(4):639-54. doi: 10.1111/famp.12151. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
Over the past decade, public funding for Couple and Relationship Education programs has expanded. As program administrators have been able to extend their reach to low-income individuals and couples using this support, it has become apparent that greater numbers of relationally distressed couples are attending classes than previously anticipated. Because psychoeducational programs for couples have traditionally served less distressed couples, this dynamic highlights the need to examine the policy and practice implications of more distressed couples accessing these services. This paper reviews some of the most immediate issues, including screening for domestic violence and couple needs, pedagogical considerations, and the potential integration of therapy and education services. We also make suggestions for future research that can inform policy and practice efforts.
在过去十年中,用于夫妻与关系教育项目的公共资金有所增加。随着项目管理人员能够利用这笔资金将服务范围扩大到低收入个人和夫妻,越来越多关系困扰的夫妻参加课程这一情况变得明显,超出了此前预期。由于传统上夫妻心理教育项目服务的是困扰程度较低的夫妻,这种变化凸显了审视更多困扰夫妻获得这些服务所带来的政策和实践影响的必要性。本文回顾了一些最直接的问题,包括家庭暴力筛查和夫妻需求、教学考量以及治疗与教育服务的潜在整合。我们还为未来研究提出建议,以为政策和实践工作提供参考。