• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年局限性前列腺癌的根治性治疗

Radical treatment of localised prostate cancer in the elderly.

作者信息

Everaerts Wouter, Van Rij Simon, Reeves Fairleigh, Costello Anthony

机构信息

Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia.

Department of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2015 Dec;116(6):847-52. doi: 10.1111/bju.13128. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1111/bju.13128
PMID:25810141
Abstract

Elderly men are more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive cancer, but are often inappropriately denied curative treatment. Biological rather than chronological age should be used to decide if a patient will profit from radical treatment. Therefore, every man aged >70 years should undergo a health assessment using a validated tool before making treatment decisions. Fit elderly men with intermediate- or high-risk disease should be offered standard curative local treatment in keeping with guidelines for younger men. Vulnerable and frail elderly men warrant geriatric intervention before treatment. In the case of vulnerable patients, this intervention may render them suitable for standard care. When considering radical prostatectomy outcomes a 'bifecta' of oncological control and continence is appropriate, as erectile dysfunction (although prevalent) has a much smaller impact on quality of life than in younger patients. Radiotherapy is an alternative to radical prostatectomy in men with a life expectancy of <10 years. Primary androgen-deprivation therapy is not associated with improved survival in localised prostate cancer and should only be used for symptom palliation. Further elderly-specific research is needed to guide prostate cancer care.

摘要

老年男性更有可能被诊断出患有侵袭性癌症,但他们常常被不恰当地拒绝接受根治性治疗。应依据生物学年龄而非实际年龄来决定患者是否能从根治性治疗中获益。因此,每位70岁以上的男性在做出治疗决策前都应使用经过验证的工具进行健康评估。身体状况良好、患有中高危疾病的老年男性应按照针对年轻男性的指南接受标准的根治性局部治疗。脆弱和体弱的老年男性在治疗前需要老年病学干预。对于脆弱患者,这种干预可能会使他们适合接受标准治疗。在考虑根治性前列腺切除术的结果时,采用肿瘤控制和控尿的“双达标”是合适的,因为勃起功能障碍(尽管很常见)对生活质量的影响比年轻患者小得多。对于预期寿命小于10年的男性,放射治疗是根治性前列腺切除术的替代方案。一线雄激素剥夺疗法与局限性前列腺癌患者生存率的提高无关,仅应用于缓解症状。需要开展更多针对老年人的研究来指导前列腺癌的治疗。

相似文献

1
Radical treatment of localised prostate cancer in the elderly.老年局限性前列腺癌的根治性治疗
BJU Int. 2015 Dec;116(6):847-52. doi: 10.1111/bju.13128. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
2
Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.根治性前列腺切除术或观察等待后长期生活质量结局:斯堪的纳维亚前列腺癌群组 4 随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):891-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70162-0. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
3
Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study.前列腺癌前列腺切除术后或放疗后的五年预后:前列腺癌预后研究
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh259.
4
Functional and oncological outcomes of patients aged <50 years treated with radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer in a European population.在欧洲人群中,接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的<50 岁以下患者的功能和肿瘤学结局。
BJU Int. 2014 Jul;114(1):38-45. doi: 10.1111/bju.12407. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
5
Quality of life impact of treatments for localized prostate cancer: cohort study with a 5 year follow-up.局限性前列腺癌治疗对生活质量的影响:一项为期5年随访的队列研究
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Aug;108(2):306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.038. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
6
Tumour characteristics, oncological and functional outcomes in patients aged ≥ 70 years undergoing radical prostatectomy.≥70 岁患者行根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤特征、肿瘤学和功能结局。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3 Pt B):E24-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11368.x. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
7
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.局限性前列腺癌的治疗:根据其自然病程(通常进展相对缓慢),可选择观察等待、手术或放射治疗。
Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8.
8
Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后按年龄分层的功能结局
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2448-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.153.
9
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite versus Incontinence Symptom Index and Sexual Health Inventory for Men to measure functional outcomes after prostatectomy.前列腺癌指数复合量表与尿失禁症状指数和男性健康问卷用于评估前列腺切除术后的功能结局。
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):221-7; discussion 227-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.155. Epub 2009 May 17.
10
Salvage radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes and long-term oncological control of radiorecurrent prostate cancer.挽救性根治性前列腺切除术:放射性复发前列腺癌的生活质量结局和长期肿瘤学控制
J Urol. 2006 Nov;176(5):2025-31; discussion 2031-2. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.075.

引用本文的文献

1
Time trends in the use of curative treatment in men 70 years and older with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.70 岁及以上非转移性前列腺癌男性患者的根治性治疗方法的使用时间趋势。
Acta Oncol. 2024 Mar 20;63:95-104. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.26189.
2
Radical prostatectomy in patients aged 75 years or older: review of the literature.75岁及以上患者的根治性前列腺切除术:文献综述
Asian J Androl. 2017 Sep 26;21(1):32-6. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_43_17.
3
Comparison of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy.
接受根治性前列腺切除术或放射治疗的前列腺癌患者生化复发情况的比较。
Korean J Urol. 2015 Oct;56(10):703-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.703. Epub 2015 Oct 2.