Doll Robert J, Veltink Peter H, Buitenweg Jan R
Biomedical Signals and Systems, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Zuidhorst, ZH222, Drienerlolaan 5, P.O. Box 217, 7500AE, Enschede, The Netherlands,
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 May;77(4):1440-7. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0865-x.
Methods to obtain estimates of psychophysical functions are used in numerous fields, such as audiology, vision, and pain. Neurophysiological and psychological processes underlying this function are assumed to remain stationary throughout a psychophysical experiment. However, violation of this assumption (e.g., due to habituation or changing decisional factors) likely affects the estimates of psychophysical parameters. We used computer simulations to study how non-stationary processes, resulting in a time-dependent psychophysical function, affect threshold and slope estimates. Moreover, we propose methods to improve the estimation quality when stationarity is violated. A psychophysical detection experiment was modeled as a stochastic process ruled by a logistic psychophysical function. The threshold was modeled to drift over time and was defined as either a linear or nonlinear function. Threshold and slope estimates were obtained by using three estimation procedures: a static procedure assuming stationarity, a relaxed procedure accounting for linear effects of time, and a threshold tracking paradigm. For illustrative purposes, data acquired from two human subjects were used to estimate their thresholds and slopes using all estimation procedures. Threshold estimates obtained by all estimations procedures were similar to the mean true threshold. However, due to threshold drift, the slope was underestimated by the static procedure. The relaxed procedure only underestimated the slope when the threshold drifted nonlinearly over time. The tracking paradigm performed best and therefore, we recommend using the tracking paradigm in human psychophysical detection experiments to obtain estimates of the threshold and slope and to identify the mode of non-stationarity.
获取心理物理学函数估计值的方法在众多领域都有应用,如听力学、视觉和疼痛研究。在整个心理物理学实验中,假定该函数背后的神经生理和心理过程保持稳定。然而,违反这一假设(例如,由于习惯化或决策因素的变化)可能会影响心理物理学参数的估计值。我们使用计算机模拟来研究导致心理物理学函数随时间变化的非平稳过程如何影响阈值和斜率估计。此外,我们提出了在平稳性被违反时提高估计质量的方法。将心理物理学检测实验建模为一个由逻辑斯蒂心理物理学函数支配的随机过程。阈值被建模为随时间漂移,并被定义为线性或非线性函数。通过使用三种估计程序获得阈值和斜率估计值:一种假设平稳性的静态程序、一种考虑时间线性效应的宽松程序以及一种阈值跟踪范式。为了便于说明,使用从两名人类受试者获取的数据,通过所有估计程序来估计他们的阈值和斜率。所有估计程序获得的阈值估计值与平均真实阈值相似。然而,由于阈值漂移,静态程序低估了斜率。当阈值随时间非线性漂移时,宽松程序才会低估斜率。跟踪范式表现最佳,因此,我们建议在人类心理物理学检测实验中使用跟踪范式来获取阈值和斜率的估计值,并识别非平稳性模式。