Yu Hongbo, Li Jia, Zhou Xiaolin
Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China.
Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China, Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (Ministry of Education), Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China, and PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China
J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 25;35(12):4917-25. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3536-14.2015.
When evaluating interpersonal transgressions, people take into account both the consequential damage and the intention of the agent. The intention and consequence, however, do not always match, as is the case with accidents and failed attempts. We combined an interactive game and functional MRI to investigate the neural substrates underlying the processing of intention and consequence, and its bearing on reactive punishment. The participant interacted with anonymous partners, who decided to deliver pain stimulation either to himself/herself or to the participant to earn a monetary reward. In some cases, the decision was reversed by the computer. After pain delivery, the partner's intention was revealed. Unbeknownst to the partner, the participant was then allowed to punish the partner by reducing his/her monetary reward. Behaviorally, the punishment was lower in the accidental condition (unintended harm relative to intended harm) but higher in the failed-attempt condition (unintended no-harm relative to intended no-harm). Neurally, the left amygdala/hippocampus was activated in the conditions with blameworthy intention (i.e., intentional harm and failed attempt). The accidental (relative to intentional) harm activated the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and the anterior inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), while the failed attempt (relative to genuine no-harm) activated the anterior insula (AI) and the posterior IFG. Effective connectivity analysis revealed that in the unintentional conditions (i.e., accidental and failed attempt) the IFG received input from the TPJ and AI, and sent regulatory signals to the amygdala. These findings demonstrate that the processing of intention may gate the emotional responses to transgression and regulate subsequent reactive punishment.
在评估人际间的违规行为时,人们会同时考虑行为造成的实际损害和行为者的意图。然而,意图和后果并不总是一致的,意外事故和未遂企图就是这种情况。我们结合了一个互动游戏和功能性磁共振成像技术,来研究意图和后果处理背后的神经基础,以及它与反应性惩罚的关系。参与者与匿名伙伴进行互动,这些伙伴决定给自己或参与者施加疼痛刺激以获得金钱奖励。在某些情况下,计算机可以改变这个决定。在施加疼痛之后,伙伴的意图会被揭示出来。在伙伴不知情的情况下,参与者随后可以通过减少其金钱奖励来惩罚该伙伴。在行为层面上,在意外情况下(相对于故意伤害而言的意外伤害)惩罚较低,但在未遂企图情况下(相对于故意无害而言的意外无害)惩罚较高。在神经层面上,在存在应受谴责意图的情况下(即故意伤害和未遂企图),左侧杏仁核/海马体被激活。意外(相对于故意)伤害激活了右侧颞顶联合区(TPJ)和额下回前部(IFG),而未遂企图(相对于真正的无害)激活了前脑岛(AI)和额下回后部(IFG)。有效连接性分析显示,在无意情况下(即意外和未遂企图),额下回从颞顶联合区和脑岛接收输入,并向杏仁核发送调节信号。这些发现表明,意图的处理可能会控制对违规行为的情绪反应,并调节随后的反应性惩罚。