Suppr超能文献

稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱后的关节囊内压力

Intracapsular Pressures After Stable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

作者信息

Crepeau Allison, Birnbaum Mark, Vander Have Kelly, Herrera-Soto Jose

机构信息

*Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA †Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, Orlando, FL ‡Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Dec;35(8):e90-2. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000440.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has been shown to have a lower rate of avascular necrosis than unstable SCFE. A recent study found increased intracapsular hip pressures in the setting of unstable SCFE, thus increasing the risk of osteonecrosis. The purpose of this study was to measure the intracapsular pressure in stable SCFE and compare it to the intracapsular pressure in normal hips and in unstable SCFE.

METHODS

Thirteen hips with stable SCFE and 15 hips with unstable SCFE were identified. Using a side-bored needle, intracapsular hip pressures were measured at the time of surgery. Within these 2 study groups, 11 unaffected (normal) hips were also measured. Diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure at the time of measurement were also recorded.

RESULTS

The average intracapsular hip pressure in the stable SCFE group was 27.0 mm Hg, whereas the average pressure in the unstable SCFE group was 48.2 mm Hg and the average pressure in the normal group was 21.8 mm Hg. There was no significant difference between the normal and stable SCFE groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the stable SCFE and unstable SCFE groups (P<0.001). We found similar trends when comparing the intracapsular hip pressure as a percentage of the mean arterial pressure as well as the difference between diastolic blood pressure and hip pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

As expected, the intracapsular pressure in the setting of stable SCFE approaches that of normal hips. This may explain why the risk of AVN in stable SCFE is significantly lower than that of unstable SCFE. It also supports the idea that capsulotomy is indicated for unstable slips to decrease the elevated hip pressure but not in stable SCFE.

摘要

目的

已表明稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)的无血管坏死发生率低于不稳定型SCFE。最近一项研究发现,在不稳定型SCFE情况下,髋关节囊内压力升高,从而增加了骨坏死风险。本研究的目的是测量稳定型SCFE的关节囊内压力,并将其与正常髋关节和不稳定型SCFE的关节囊内压力进行比较。

方法

确定了13例稳定型SCFE髋关节和15例不稳定型SCFE髋关节。在手术时使用侧孔针测量髋关节囊内压力。在这两个研究组中,还测量了11个未受影响(正常)的髋关节。同时记录测量时的舒张压和平均动脉压。

结果

稳定型SCFE组的平均髋关节囊内压力为27.0 mmHg,而不稳定型SCFE组的平均压力为48.2 mmHg,正常组的平均压力为21.8 mmHg。正常组和稳定型SCFE组之间无显著差异。稳定型SCFE组和不稳定型SCFE组之间存在统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。在比较髋关节囊内压力占平均动脉压的百分比以及舒张压与髋关节压力之间的差异时,我们发现了类似的趋势。

结论

正如预期的那样,稳定型SCFE情况下的关节囊内压力接近正常髋关节。这可能解释了为什么稳定型SCFE的AVN风险明显低于不稳定型SCFE。这也支持了这样一种观点,即对于不稳定型滑脱,应进行关节囊切开术以降低升高的髋关节压力,但对于稳定型SCFE则不需要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验