Dogan Hasan Serkan, Altan Mesut, Citamak Burak, Bozaci Ali Cansu, Karabulut Erdem, Tekgul Serdar
Department of Urology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Urology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
Despite the fact that shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) remains a very good treatment option for smaller stones, it is being challenged by endourologic treatment modalities, which offer similar or even higher success rates in a shorter time, with minimal morbidity and invasiveness. The present study aimed to bring a new and practical insight in order to predict the outcomes of pediatric SWL and to provide objective information about pediatric SWL outcomes.
To design a nomogram for predicting the outcomes of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
The study was conducted with a retrospective design and included 402 renal units who underwent SWL between January 2009 and August 2013. Patients with known cystine stone disease and cystinuria, with internal or external urinary diversion, were excluded. Analysis was performed on 383 renal units. Postoperative imaging was performed by plain abdominal graphy and ultrasonography with 3-month intervals. Patients who were completely free of stones were considered to be a success and statistical analysis was done regardingly Multivariate analysis was conducted by logistic regression analysis and a nomogram was developed.
The male/female distribution was 216/167, with a mean age of 48 ± 40 months and a mean stone size of 9 ± 3.5 mm. The overall stone-free rate was 70% (270/383) and efficacy quotient was 0.57. Mean follow-up was 11 ± 11 months (3-54 months). The number of shock waves and amplitude of energy were higher in failed cases. Multivariate analysis showed that gender, stone size, number of stones, age, location of the stone, and history of previous intervention were found to be the independent prognostic factors for assessing the stone clearance rates. A nomogram was developed using these parameters. In this nomogram, the points achieved from each parameter are summed and total points correspond to the risk of failure in percent.
A previous nomogram study by Onal et al. showed that younger age (<5 years), smaller stone burden (<1 cm), absence of previous stone treatment history, single stone, pelvis or upper ureter location (in girls) were favorable prognostic factors for successful outcome. As being the first pediatric study, it had some shortcomings. The study included 381 patients within a time period of 16 years. The present study included a similar number of cases within a 4-year period, which may reflect more homogeneity of data collection. Another issue is concern about the practical use of that nomogram. It constitutes two pages, which is a limiting factor for daily use. From a statistical point of view, they performed 200 bootstrapings with the aim of internal validation, which is less than the ideal number of 1000 bootstrapings, which was performed in the present nomogram. The presented nomogram is more practical, in that the pre-operative factors can be placed on the nomogram, the points can be added up and the parents can be given the approximate percentage of predicted stone-free rate after a single session. The expected treatment modality shown to the parents and patients ought to be the least minimally invasive, have the highest success rate, the least complication rate, and show the efficacy in one procedure at a time within the shortest period. However, SWL does not completely meet these criteria. The results gained from the present critical analysis of SWL in children, which was based on a strict definition of success, showed that outcome after a single session is not that good. Therefore, defining the patients who will benefit the most became one of the main issues. A more objective and skeptical look at SWL data enabled a nomogram to be developed that brings a new and practical insight in order to predict the outcomes of pediatric SWL.
In most of the pediatric stone cases, SWL is the first-line treatment option. However, it is wise to define the patients who will benefit the most. Therefore, nomograms can be useful for this purpose. The nomogram in the present study revealed that gender, stone size, number of stones, age, location of the stone, and history of previous intervention were found to be the independent prognostic factors for assessing the stone clearance rates. This nomogram can practically be used to inform the parents, and for proper patient selection for SWL.
尽管冲击波碎石术(SWL)对于较小结石仍是一种非常好的治疗选择,但它正受到腔内泌尿外科治疗方式的挑战,后者在更短时间内成功率相似甚至更高,且发病率和侵入性最小。本研究旨在提供新的实用见解,以预测小儿SWL的结果,并提供有关小儿SWL结果的客观信息。
设计一种用于预测小儿冲击波碎石术结果的列线图。
本研究采用回顾性设计,纳入了2009年1月至2013年8月间接受SWL治疗的402个肾单位。排除已知患有胱氨酸结石病和胱氨酸尿症、有体内或体外尿液改道的患者。对383个肾单位进行分析。术后通过腹部平片和超声检查,每隔3个月进行一次成像。结石完全清除的患者被视为成功,并据此进行统计分析。通过逻辑回归分析进行多变量分析,并绘制列线图。
男女分布为216/167,平均年龄为48±40个月,平均结石大小为9±3.5毫米。总体结石清除率为70%(270/383),疗效商为0.57。平均随访时间为11±11个月(3 - 54个月)。失败病例的冲击波次数和能量幅度更高。多变量分析表明,性别、结石大小、结石数量、年龄、结石位置和既往干预史是评估结石清除率的独立预后因素。利用这些参数绘制了列线图。在该列线图中,每个参数获得的分数相加,总分对应失败风险的百分比。
奥纳尔等人之前的一项列线图研究表明,年龄较小(<5岁)、结石负荷较小(<1厘米)、无既往结石治疗史、单发结石、肾盂或上输尿管位置(女孩)是成功结果的有利预后因素。作为第一项小儿研究,它存在一些缺点。该研究在16年的时间里纳入了381例患者。本研究在4年时间里纳入了类似数量的病例,这可能反映了数据收集的更高同质性。另一个问题是对该列线图实际应用的担忧。它由两页组成,这是日常使用的一个限制因素。从统计学角度来看,他们为进行内部验证进行了200次自助法抽样,这少于本列线图中进行的理想的1000次自助法抽样。本研究提出的列线图更实用,因为术前因素可以放在列线图上,分数可以相加,并且可以在单次治疗后向家长给出预测结石清除率的大致百分比。向家长和患者展示的预期治疗方式应该是侵入性最小、成功率最高、并发症率最低,并且在最短时间内一次手术就能显示疗效。然而,SWL并不完全符合这些标准。基于对成功的严格定义,对儿童SWL进行的本次批判性分析所获得的结果表明,单次治疗后的结果并不理想。因此,确定最能受益的患者成为主要问题之一。对SWL数据进行更客观和审慎的审视,使得能够开发出一种列线图,为预测小儿SWL的结果提供新的实用见解。
在大多数小儿结石病例中,SWL是一线治疗选择。然而,确定最能受益的患者是明智的。因此,列线图可用于此目的。本研究中的列线图显示,性别、结石大小、结石数量、年龄、结石位置和既往干预史是评估结石清除率的独立预后因素。该列线图可实际用于告知家长,并用于SWL的合适患者选择。