Suppr超能文献

有听力损失和无听力损失儿童对用于区分发音方式的声学线索的权重

Weighting of Acoustic Cues to a Manner Distinction by Children With and Without Hearing Loss.

作者信息

Nittrouer Susan, Lowenstein Joanna H

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):1077-92. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0263.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Children must develop optimal perceptual weighting strategies for processing speech in their first language. Hearing loss can interfere with that development, especially if cochlear implants are required. The three goals of this study were to measure, for children with and without hearing loss: (a) cue weighting for a manner distinction, (b) sensitivity to those cues, and (c) real-world communication functions.

METHOD

One hundred and seven children (43 with normal hearing [NH], 17 with hearing aids [HAs], and 47 with cochlear implants [CIs]) performed several tasks: labeling of stimuli from /bɑ/-to-/wɑ/ continua varying in formant and amplitude rise time (FRT and ART), discrimination of ART, word recognition, and phonemic awareness.

RESULTS

Children with hearing loss were less attentive overall to acoustic structure than children with NH. Children with CIs, but not those with HAs, weighted FRT less and ART more than children with NH. Sensitivity could not explain cue weighting. FRT cue weighting explained significant amounts of variability in word recognition and phonemic awareness; ART cue weighting did not.

CONCLUSION

Signal degradation inhibits access to spectral structure for children with CIs, but cannot explain their delayed development of optimal weighting strategies. Auditory training could strengthen the weighting of spectral cues for children with CIs, thus aiding spoken language acquisition.

摘要

目的

儿童必须发展出处理其母语语音的最佳感知加权策略。听力损失会干扰这一发展过程,尤其是在需要植入人工耳蜗的情况下。本研究的三个目标是针对有听力损失和无听力损失的儿童测量:(a) 对发音方式区别的线索加权,(b) 对这些线索的敏感度,以及 (c) 现实世界中的交流功能。

方法

107名儿童(43名听力正常 [NH],17名佩戴助听器 [HA],47名植入人工耳蜗 [CI])完成了几项任务:对来自 /bɑ/ 到 /wɑ/ 连续体的刺激进行标注,这些刺激在共振峰和振幅上升时间(FRT和ART)方面有所变化,辨别ART,单词识别,以及音素意识。

结果

与听力正常的儿童相比,有听力损失的儿童总体上对声学结构的关注度较低。与听力正常的儿童相比,植入人工耳蜗的儿童对FRT的加权较少,对ART的加权较多,而佩戴助听器的儿童则不然。敏感度无法解释线索加权情况。FRT线索加权解释了单词识别和音素意识中大量的变异性;ART线索加权则没有。

结论

信号退化会抑制植入人工耳蜗儿童对频谱结构的获取,但无法解释他们最佳加权策略发展延迟的情况。听觉训练可以增强植入人工耳蜗儿童对频谱线索的加权,从而有助于口语习得。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Cue weight in the perception of Trique glottal consonants.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Feb;135(2):884-95. doi: 10.1121/1.4861921.
9
Amplitude rise time does not cue the /ba/-/wa/ contrast for adults or children.音幅上升时间不会为成人或儿童提示 /ba/-/wa/ 的对比。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):427-40. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0075). Epub 2012 Sep 19.
10
Speech perception in noise by children with cochlear implants.人工耳蜗植入儿童的噪声下言语感知。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Feb;56(1):13-30. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0338). Epub 2012 Jun 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验