Suppr超能文献

GNRB®对于完全性前交叉韧带撕裂压力负荷的诊断价值:一项针对118名受试者的前瞻性病例对照研究。

Diagnostic value of the GNRB ® in relation to pressure load for complete ACL tears: A prospective case-control study of 118 subjects.

作者信息

Klouche S, Lefevre N, Cascua S, Herman S, Gerometta A, Bohu Y

机构信息

Clinique du Sport Paris V, 75005 Paris, France; Institut de l'Appareil Locomoteur Nollet, 75017 Paris, France.

Clinique du Sport Paris V, 75005 Paris, France; Institut de l'Appareil Locomoteur Nollet, 75017 Paris, France.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 May;101(3):297-300. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The GNRB(®) is a reliable, validated arthrometer. A pressure pad exerts 0 to 250 Newtons of pressure on the upper calf. The goal of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of the different pressure loads that are usually applied for the diagnosis of complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Our hypothesis was that a load of 200N would be sufficient to diagnose these tears.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective comparative case-control study was performed in 2012. One group included all the male athletes aged 15 to 21 who presented with a complete ACL tear confirmed by arthroscopy (the study group). The control group included male soccer players in a training center aged 15 to 19 with no history of knee injuries (the control group). Anterior laxity was measured in both knees by the same experienced operator using the GNRB(®) system. The main judgment criteria were the diagnostic values of each pressure load evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC), from "Null" (AUC < 0.5) to "Perfect" (AUC = 1).

RESULTS

This study included 118 men: 64 in the study group, mean age 18.1 ± 2.3-years-old, who were mainly soccer players (39/64) or rugby men (16/64) and 54 control subjects, mean age 17.3 ± 1.5-years-old. Three hyperalgesic patients could not receive a pressure load of 250N. The mean differential laxity was significantly higher in the control group, whatever the pressure load (P < 10(-5)). The test was "highly informative" for all loads (0.9 ≤ AUC < 1). Analysis of the AUC revealed a diagnostic value in descending order of: 200N(0.97[0.94-1]) > 134N(0.97[0.93-0.99]) > 250N(0.96[0.93-0.99]) > 89N(0.95[0.90-0.99]).

CONCLUSION

The GNRB(®) at 200N was shown to be sufficient to diagnose complete ACL tears. Applying a pressure load of 250N does not appear to be useful.

摘要

引言

GNRB(®)是一种可靠的、经过验证的关节动度仪。一个压力垫会对上小腿施加0至250牛顿的压力。本研究的目的是比较通常用于诊断前交叉韧带(ACL)完全撕裂的不同压力负荷的诊断价值。我们的假设是200牛的负荷足以诊断这些撕裂。

患者与方法

2012年进行了一项前瞻性比较病例对照研究。一组包括所有年龄在15至21岁、经关节镜检查确诊为ACL完全撕裂的男性运动员(研究组)。对照组包括一个训练中心的15至19岁、无膝关节损伤史的男性足球运动员(对照组)。由同一位经验丰富的操作人员使用GNRB(®)系统测量双膝的前侧松弛度。主要判断标准是通过曲线下面积(AUC)评估的每个压力负荷的诊断价值,范围从“无诊断价值”(AUC < 0.5)到“完美诊断”(AUC = 1)。

结果

本研究纳入118名男性:研究组64名,平均年龄18.1 ± 2.3岁,主要是足球运动员(39/64)或橄榄球运动员(16/64);对照组54名,平均年龄17.3 ± 1.5岁。三名痛觉过敏患者无法承受250牛的压力负荷。无论压力负荷如何,对照组的平均差异松弛度均显著更高(P < 10⁻⁵)。该测试对所有负荷均“信息丰富”(0.9 ≤ AUC < 1)。对AUC的分析显示诊断价值从高到低依次为:200牛(0.97[0.94 - 1])> 134牛(0.97[0.93 - 0.99])> 250牛(0.96[0.93 - 0.99])> 89牛(0.95[0.90 - 0.99])。

结论

结果表明,200牛的GNRB(®)足以诊断ACL完全撕裂。施加250牛的压力负荷似乎并无用处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验