• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带重建后残余前松弛度对功能结果的影响。

Influence of residual anterior laxity on functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

机构信息

Département de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie unité de chirurgie du membre inférieur, hôpital Lapeyronie, CHU de Montpellier, 371, avenue Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France.

DIM, unité de recherche clinique et épidémiologique, hôpital Lapeyronie, CHRU de Montpellier, 371, avenue Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 May;108(3):103264. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103264. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103264
PMID:35248790
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Residual laxity can persist after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This increased anterior translation can be measured with a knee arthrometer. Nevertheless, the measurement parameters and functional impact of this residual laxity are not well understood. The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the effect of applying loads of 134N, 200N and 250N on the measured residual laxity after ACL reconstruction and (2) evaluate the prognostic ability of the various measurement parameters on the functional outcomes.

HYPOTHESIS

After ACL reconstruction, the functional outcomes will be correlated to the postoperative residual laxity.

METHODS

We did a prospective study of 61 recreational athletes who underwent surgical reconstruction of their ACL with the Kenneth-Jones technique between 2016 and 2019. The mean age of these patients was 27±7 years, and most were men (75%). The side-to-side difference in laxity was measured pre- and postoperatively using the GNRB® arthrometer at three load levels: 134N, 200N and 250N. The functional outcomes were determined based on the return to sports and the KOOS, IKDC and ARPEGE scores. The mean follow-up was 30±10 months.

RESULTS

Half the patients had returned to sport at their pre-injury levels, while 25% had returned to a lower level and 25% had stopped doing any physical activity. At 134N, a 1-mm increase in side-to-side difference was associated with a 2-fold higher risk of not returning to sports (OR 2; 95% CI 1.22-3.23; p<0.01). At 200N, a 1-mm increase in side-to-side difference was associated with a 50% higher probability of having a poor/fair ARPEGE score (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.05-2.02; p=0.02). At 200N, a 4-mm side-to-side difference was the prognostic threshold for failure to return to sports with a positive predictive value of 86% and specificity of 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series found a strong correlation between residual laxity and the functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. A threshold of 4mm residual laxity evaluated on the GNRB® at 200N was predictive of adverse outcomes and failure to return to sports in our population of recreational athletes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

摘要

简介

前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后可能仍存在残余松弛。这种增加的前向平移可以通过膝关节关节测径仪测量。然而,这种残余松弛的测量参数和功能影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是:(1)评估在 ACL 重建后施加 134N、200N 和 250N 载荷对测量残余松弛的影响;(2)评估各种测量参数对功能结果的预后能力。

假设

ACL 重建后,功能结果将与术后残余松弛相关。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,纳入了 2016 年至 2019 年间接受 Kenneth-Jones 技术手术重建 ACL 的 61 名娱乐运动员。这些患者的平均年龄为 27±7 岁,大多数为男性(75%)。使用 GNRB®关节测径仪在三个载荷水平(134N、200N 和 250N)测量术前和术后的松弛度侧别差值。根据重返运动和 KOOS、IKDC 和 ARPEGE 评分来确定功能结果。平均随访时间为 30±10 个月。

结果

一半的患者恢复到术前的运动水平,25%的患者恢复到较低水平,25%的患者停止了任何体育活动。在 134N 时,侧别差值增加 1mm 与不重返运动的风险增加 2 倍相关(OR 2;95%CI 1.22-3.23;p<0.01)。在 200N 时,侧别差值增加 1mm 与 ARPEGE 评分差/差的可能性增加 50%相关(OR 1.5;95%CI 1.05-2.02;p=0.02)。在 200N 时,4mm 的侧别差值是预测运动失败的预后阈值,阳性预测值为 86%,特异性为 98%。

结论

本病例系列研究发现 ACL 重建后残余松弛与功能结果之间存在很强的相关性。在我们的娱乐运动员人群中,200N 时 GNRB®上测量的 4mm 残余松弛阈值可预测不良结果和运动失败。

证据水平

IV,回顾性研究。

相似文献

1
Influence of residual anterior laxity on functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建后残余前松弛度对功能结果的影响。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 May;108(3):103264. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103264. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Tape Locking Screw (TLS) and a short hamstring graft: Clinical evaluation of 61 cases with a minimum 12 months' follow-up.采用 Tape Locking Screw(TLS)和半腱肌肌腱重建前交叉韧带:61 例至少随访 12 个月的临床评估。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Sep;104(5):701-705. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
3
ACL reconstruction in 11 children using the Clocheville surgical technique: Objective and subjective evaluation.采用克洛谢维尔手术技术对11名儿童进行前交叉韧带重建:客观和主观评估。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Jun;102(4 Suppl):S205-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
4
[Augmentation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Patients with Symptomatic Isolated Tear of Anteromedial or Posterolateral Bundle: Evaluation of Two-Year Clinical Results].[有症状的前内侧或后外侧束孤立性撕裂患者的前交叉韧带增强术:两年临床结果评估]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(4):296-302.
5
Effect of High-Grade Preoperative Knee Laxity on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes.术前膝关节高度松弛对前交叉韧带重建结果的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3077-3082. doi: 10.1177/0363546516656835. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
6
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores knee laxity but shows inferior functional knee outcome compared with primary reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建的翻修术可恢复膝关节松弛度,但与初次重建相比,其膝关节功能结局较差。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5059-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
[Anatomical All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Semitendinosus Tendon Graft with Posteromedial Harvest - Clinical Results of Prospective Study at a Minimum 12-Months Follow-up].[使用经后内侧取材的四倍半腱肌腱移植物进行解剖学全关节内前交叉韧带重建——至少随访12个月的前瞻性研究临床结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(2):94-101.
8
Anterior and Rotational Knee Laxity Does Not Affect Patient-Reported Knee Function 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前向和旋转膝关节松弛不会影响前交叉韧带重建后 2 年的患者报告膝关节功能。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(9):2077-2085. doi: 10.1177/0363546519857076.
9
Effects of pre-operative knee laxity on clinical outcomes after partial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.术前膝关节松弛对前交叉韧带部分重建术后临床疗效的影响。
Knee. 2018 Jun;25(3):445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
10
Outcomes of Slope-Reducing Proximal Tibial Osteotomy Combined With a Third Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedure With a Focus on Return to Impact Sports.胫骨近端截骨术联合第三前交叉韧带重建术治疗的结果分析,重点关注重返撞击性运动。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Nov;51(13):3454-3463. doi: 10.1177/03635465231203016. Epub 2023 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Mild Residual Rotational Laxity on Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.轻度残余旋转松弛对前交叉韧带重建术后性能的影响。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 16;13(7):23259671251352205. doi: 10.1177/23259671251352205. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Early Postoperative Evaluation of Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition, Anterior Knee Laxity, and Kinesiophobia After ACL Reconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.前交叉韧带重建术后关节源性肌肉抑制、前膝松弛和运动恐惧的早期术后评估:一项横断面观察性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;13(13):1481. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131481.
3
Plate-augmented fixation of comminuted Letenneur type II Hoffa fractures provides favorable stability compared to isolated posteroanterior screw fixation - a biomechanical study.
与单纯前后位螺钉固定相比,钢板增强固定粉碎性Letenneur II型Hoffa骨折具有更好的稳定性——一项生物力学研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 May 19;145(1):301. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05920-x.
4
Knee instability caused by altered graft mechanical properties after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the early onset of osteoarthritis?前交叉韧带重建术后移植物力学性能改变导致的膝关节不稳:骨关节炎的早期发病?
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 24;11:1244954. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1244954. eCollection 2023.
5
Evaluation of Muscle Strength and Graft Laxity With Early Open Kinetic Chain Exercise After ACL Reconstruction: A Cohort Study.前交叉韧带重建术后早期开链运动对肌肉力量和移植物松弛度的评估:一项队列研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jun 27;11(6):23259671231177594. doi: 10.1177/23259671231177594. eCollection 2023 Jun.