• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对个体患者绝对治疗获益的估计需要对统计相互作用进行仔细建模。

Estimates of absolute treatment benefit for individual patients required careful modeling of statistical interactions.

作者信息

van Klaveren David, Vergouwe Yvonne, Farooq Vasim, Serruys Patrick W, Steyerberg Ewout W

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;68(11):1366-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.012
PMID:25814403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5569577/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare modeling approaches to estimate the individual survival benefit of treatment with either coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with complex coronary artery disease.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We estimated survival with Cox regression models that included the treatment variable (CABG/PCI) interacting with either an internally developed overall prognostic index (PI) or with individual prognostic factors. We analyzed data of patients who were randomized in the Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery trial (1,800 patients, 178 deaths).

RESULTS

A negligible interaction with the PI (P = 0.51) led to 4-year survival estimates in favor of CABG for all patients. In contrast, individual interactions indicated substantial relative treatment effect heterogeneity (overall interaction P = 0.004), and estimates of 4-year survival were numerically in favor of CABG for 1,275 of 1,800 patients (71%; 519 with 95% confidence). To test the more complex model with individual interactions, we first used penalized regression, resulting in smaller but largely consistent individual estimates of the survival difference between CABG and PCI. Second, strong treatment interactions were confirmed at external validation in 2,891 patients from a multinational registry.

CONCLUSION

Modeling strategies that omit interactions may result in misleading estimates of absolute treatment benefit for individual patients with the potential hazard of suboptimal decision making.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较不同的建模方法,以评估冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对复杂冠状动脉疾病患者的个体生存获益。

研究设计与背景

我们使用Cox回归模型估计生存率,该模型纳入了治疗变量(CABG/PCI)与内部开发的总体预后指数(PI)或个体预后因素的交互作用。我们分析了在紫杉醇涂层支架与心脏手术协同试验中随机分组的患者数据(1800例患者,178例死亡)。

结果

与PI的交互作用可忽略不计(P = 0.51),这使得所有患者4年生存率的估计结果有利于CABG。相比之下,个体交互作用表明治疗的相对效果存在显著异质性(总体交互作用P = 0.004),1800例患者中有1275例(71%;519例具有95%置信区间)的4年生存率估计在数值上有利于CABG。为了检验具有个体交互作用的更复杂模型,我们首先使用了惩罚回归,结果得到了CABG和PCI之间生存差异的更小但基本一致的个体估计值。其次,在来自多国登记处的2891例患者的外部验证中证实了强烈的治疗交互作用。

结论

忽略交互作用的建模策略可能会导致对个体患者绝对治疗获益的误导性估计,并可能带来次优决策的潜在风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/233b/5569577/fa0f08f979f2/nihms675046f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/233b/5569577/cdf179918de1/nihms675046f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/233b/5569577/8c239338e896/nihms675046f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/233b/5569577/fa0f08f979f2/nihms675046f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/233b/5569577/cdf179918de1/nihms675046f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/233b/5569577/8c239338e896/nihms675046f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/233b/5569577/fa0f08f979f2/nihms675046f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimates of absolute treatment benefit for individual patients required careful modeling of statistical interactions.对个体患者绝对治疗获益的估计需要对统计相互作用进行仔细建模。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;68(11):1366-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
2
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗 3 支血管病变或左主干病变患者的成本效益:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的最终结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
3
Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial.在紫杉醇药物涂层支架与心脏搭桥术联合治疗左主干病变研究中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变患者的 5 年结果。
Circulation. 2014 Jun 10;129(23):2388-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006689. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
4
Analysis of stroke occurring in the SYNTAX trial comparing coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of complex coronary artery disease.SYNTAX 试验中发生的卒中分析:冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗复杂冠状动脉疾病的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):344-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.11.010. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
5
Risk profile and 3-year outcomes from the SYNTAX percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting nested registries.SYNTAX 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术嵌套注册研究的风险特征和 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jun;5(6):618-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.02.013.
6
The negative impact of incomplete angiographic revascularization on clinical outcomes and its association with total occlusions: the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trial.不完全血运重建对临床结局的负面影响及其与完全闭塞的关系:SYNTAX(紫杉醇药物涂层支架与心脏搭桥术的SYNERGY)试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 22;61(3):282-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
7
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在需要透析的终末期肾病患者中的比较(CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 登记研究队列-2 的 5 年结果)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
8
Comparison of Five-Year Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Triple-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease (from the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三支血管冠状动脉疾病的五年疗效比较(来自京都经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/冠状动脉旁路移植术注册队列-2的冠状动脉血运重建疗效研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 1;116(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.040. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
9
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
10
Incidence, correlates, and significance of abnormal cardiac enzyme rises in patients treated with surgical or percutaneous based revascularisation: a substudy from the Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Interventions with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术联合治疗(SYNTAX)试验中的亚研究:手术或经皮血运重建治疗患者中心脏酶异常升高的发生率、相关性和意义。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;168(6):5287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing postoperative chemotherapy for ampullary cancer: A risk-driven approach to precision care.优化壶腹癌术后化疗:一种基于风险的精准医疗方法。
ILIVER. 2025 Apr 26;4(2):100166. doi: 10.1016/j.iliver.2025.100166. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The potential benefit of statin prescription based on prediction of treatment responsiveness in older individuals: an application to the PROSPER randomized controlled trial.基于对老年个体治疗反应性预测的他汀类药物处方的潜在益处:PROSPER 随机对照试验的应用。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Jun 3;31(8):945-953. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad383.
3
Performance metrics for models designed to predict treatment effect.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical ineligibility and mortality among patients with unprotected left main or multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的无保护左主干或多支冠状动脉疾病患者的手术禁忌和死亡率
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):2295-301. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011541. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
2
Graphical assessment of incremental value of novel markers in prediction models: From statistical to decision analytical perspectives.预测模型中新型标志物增量价值的图形评估:从统计学到决策分析视角
Biom J. 2015 Jul;57(4):556-70. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201300260. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
3
用于预测治疗效果的模型的性能指标。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jul 8;23(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01974-w.
4
The optimal dynamic treatment rule superlearner: considerations, performance, and application to criminal justice interventions.最优动态治疗规则超级学习者:考虑因素、性能及在刑事司法干预中的应用。
Int J Biostat. 2022 Jun 16;19(1):217-238. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2020-0127. eCollection 2023 May 1.
5
Development of a prediction model in female pure or predominant urge urinary incontinence: a retrospective cohort study.女性单纯性或主要为急迫性尿失禁预测模型的开发:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Apr 20;14:17562872221090319. doi: 10.1177/17562872221090319. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects: a scoping review.预测异质治疗效果的方法:范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 23;20(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01145-1.
7
On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies.发表的预后评分在观察性研究中因果推断的聚集。
Stat Med. 2020 May 15;39(10):1440-1457. doi: 10.1002/sim.8489. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
8
The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement.预测治疗效果异质性的方法(PATH)声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):35-45. doi: 10.7326/M18-3667. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
9
The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration.预测治疗效果异质性的方法(PATH)声明:解释和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):W1-W25. doi: 10.7326/M18-3668. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
10
Models with interactions overestimated heterogeneity of treatment effects and were prone to treatment mistargeting.具有相互作用的模型高估了治疗效果的异质性,并且容易导致治疗目标错误。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;114:72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
Exploring interaction effects in small samples increases rates of false-positive and false-negative findings: results from a systematic review and simulation study.
在小样本中探索交互作用会增加假阳性和假阴性发现的发生率:系统评价和模拟研究的结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):821-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
4
Using internally developed risk models to assess heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials.使用内部开发的风险模型评估临床试验中治疗效果的异质性。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jan;7(1):163-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000497. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
5
Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II.解剖学和临床特征指导个体患者冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗决策:SYNTAX 评分 II 的制定和验证。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):639-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60108-7.
6
Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: stratified medicine research.预后研究策略(PROGRESS)4:分层医学研究。
BMJ. 2013 Feb 5;346:e5793. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5793.
7
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the FREEDOM trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗糖尿病合并多支血管病变患者的成本效益比较:来自 FREEDOM 试验的结果。
Circulation. 2013 Feb 19;127(7):820-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.147488. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
8
Combined anatomical and clinical factors for the long-term risk stratification of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the Logistic Clinical SYNTAX score.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者长期风险分层的解剖学和临床综合因素:Logistic 临床 SYNTAX 评分。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Dec;33(24):3098-104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs295. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
9
Drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease. The DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.药物洗脱支架治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病。DELTA 注册研究:一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jul;5(7):718-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.022.
10
Economic outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease: one-year results from the SYNTAX trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗左主干或三血管病变患者的经济学结局:SYNTAX 试验一年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb 1;79(2):198-209. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23147. Epub 2011 Sep 26.