Powell Georgina, Sumner Petroc, Bompas Aline
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Vinatier, Bron, Cedex, France.
J Vis. 2015 Mar 26;15(3):20. doi: 10.1167/15.3.20.
The question of whether eye movements influence afterimage perception has been asked since the 18th century, and yet there is surprisingly little consensus on how robust these effects are and why they occur. The number of historical theories aiming to explain the effects are more numerous than clear experimental demonstrations of such effects. We provide a clearer characterization of when eye movements and blinks do or do not affect afterimages with the aim to distinguish between historical theories and integrate them with a modern understanding of perception. We found neither saccades nor pursuit reduced strong afterimage duration, and blinks actually increased afterimage duration when tested in the light. However, for weak afterimages, we found saccades reduced duration, and blinks and pursuit eye movements did not. One interpretation of these results is that saccades diminish afterimage perception because they cause the afterimage to move unlike a real object. Furthermore, because saccades affect weak afterimages but not strong ones, we suggest that their effect is modulated by the ambiguity of the afterimage signal.
自18世纪以来,人们就一直在探讨眼球运动是否会影响后像感知的问题,然而,令人惊讶的是,对于这些影响的强度以及产生原因,人们几乎没有达成共识。旨在解释这些影响的历史理论数量众多,但此类影响的明确实验证明却寥寥无几。我们更清晰地描述了眼球运动和眨眼在何时会影响或不影响后像,目的是区分历史理论,并将它们与现代感知理解相结合。我们发现,无论是扫视还是追踪都不会缩短强烈后像的持续时间,而在光照条件下进行测试时,眨眼实际上会增加后像的持续时间。然而,对于微弱后像,我们发现扫视会缩短其持续时间,而眨眼和追踪眼球运动则不会。这些结果的一种解释是,扫视会减弱后像感知,因为它们会使后像移动,这与真实物体不同。此外,由于扫视会影响微弱后像而不是强烈后像,我们认为它们的影响是由后像信号的模糊性调节的。