Suppr超能文献

评估用于成人角膜上皮维持的替代干细胞假说。

Evaluating alternative stem cell hypotheses for adult corneal epithelial maintenance.

机构信息

John D West, Natalie J Dorà, Genes and Development Group, Centre for Integrative Physiology, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9XD Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

World J Stem Cells. 2015 Mar 26;7(2):281-99. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i2.281.

Abstract

In this review we evaluate evidence for three different hypotheses that explain how the corneal epithelium is maintained. The limbal epithelial stem cell (LESC) hypothesis is most widely accepted. This proposes that stem cells in the basal layer of the limbal epithelium, at the periphery of the cornea, maintain themselves and also produce transient (or transit) amplifying cells (TACs). TACs then move centripetally to the centre of the cornea in the basal layer of the corneal epithelium and also replenish cells in the overlying suprabasal layers. The LESCs maintain the corneal epithelium during normal homeostasis and become more active to repair significant wounds. Second, the corneal epithelial stem cell (CESC) hypothesis postulates that, during normal homeostasis, stem cells distributed throughout the basal corneal epithelium, maintain the tissue. According to this hypothesis, LESCs are present in the limbus but are only active during wound healing. We also consider a third possibility, that the corneal epithelium is maintained during normal homeostasis by proliferation of basal corneal epithelial cells without any input from stem cells. After reviewing the published evidence, we conclude that the LESC and CESC hypotheses are consistent with more of the evidence than the third hypothesis, so we do not consider this further. The LESC and CESC hypotheses each have difficulty accounting for one main type of evidence so we evaluate the two key lines of evidence that discriminate between them. Finally, we discuss how lineage-tracing experiments have begun to resolve the debate in favour of the LESC hypothesis. Nevertheless, it also seems likely that some basal corneal epithelial cells can act as long-term progenitors if limbal stem cell function is compromised. Thus, this aspect of the CESC hypothesis may have a lasting impact on our understanding of corneal epithelial maintenance, even if it is eventually shown that stem cells are restricted to the limbus as proposed by the LESC hypothesis.

摘要

在这篇综述中,我们评估了三种不同假说的证据,这些假说解释了角膜上皮是如何维持的。边缘上皮干细胞(LESC)假说最为广泛接受。该假说提出,角膜缘上皮基底层(角膜边缘)的干细胞维持自身,并产生短暂(或过渡)扩增细胞(TAC)。然后,TAC 向心性移动到角膜中央,位于角膜上皮的基底层,并补充位于其上的超基底层的细胞。LESCs 在正常的体内平衡中维持角膜上皮,并且在修复严重创伤时变得更加活跃。其次,角膜上皮干细胞(CESC)假说假设,在正常的体内平衡中,分布在整个基底层角膜上皮的干细胞维持组织。根据这一假说,LESCs 存在于角膜缘,但仅在伤口愈合过程中活跃。我们还考虑了第三种可能性,即正常体内平衡期间,角膜上皮由基底角膜上皮细胞的增殖维持,而不需要干细胞的任何输入。在回顾了已发表的证据后,我们得出结论,LESC 和 CESC 假说与更多证据一致,而不是第三个假说,因此我们不再进一步考虑。LESC 和 CESC 假说都难以解释一种主要类型的证据,因此我们评估了区分这两种假说的两条关键证据线。最后,我们讨论了谱系追踪实验如何开始有利于 LESC 假说的争论。然而,如果limbal stem cell 功能受损,一些基底角膜上皮细胞似乎也可以作为长期祖细胞发挥作用。因此,即使最终表明干细胞如 LESC 假说所提出的那样仅限于角膜缘,CESC 假说的这一方面也可能对我们对角膜上皮维持的理解产生持久的影响。

相似文献

8
Limbal and corneal epithelial homeostasis.角膜缘和角膜上皮稳态。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;28(4):348-354. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000378.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Advances in Stem Cells of Corneal Epithelia.角膜上皮干细胞的最新进展
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 May 1;66(5):45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.5.45.
5
Eyes open on stem cells.干细胞睁开了眼睛。
Stem Cell Reports. 2023 Dec 12;18(12):2313-2327. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.10.023. Epub 2023 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验