School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Appetite. 2015 Jul;90:248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
Impulsivity is associated with appetitive behaviour such as heightened sensitivity to cues of reward. Impulsivity may thus confer a vulnerability to weight gain by virtue of over-responsiveness to rewarding appetitive cues. This vulnerability should be detectable as heightened cognitive and behavioural responsiveness to food cues, namely, an attentional bias to food-stimuli, subjective wanting, and loss of inhibitory control. We examined this proposition by measuring reactions to acute, in-vivo, food-cue exposure in low-impulsive and high-impulsive individuals. We expected that high-impulsive individuals would: (1) show a greater attentional bias towards pictorial food cues presented after in-vivo food cue exposure; (2) show a greater appetitive reaction to high-calorie snack foods; and (3) show poorer inhibitory control after in vivo exposure compared to control. Fifty female participants (25 yr ± 1.1; 24 kg/m2 ± 0.6) randomly allocated to either a high-calorie food-cue exposure or food-neutral control condition subsequently completed a food-cue visual probe reaction time task, subjective ratings of appetitive state and the Stop-Signal task. A significant Group-by-Duration interaction indicated that high-impulsives show slowed disengagement (longer RTs for 2000 ms duration) of pictorial food stimuli compared to their low-impulsive counterparts. Conversely, the low impulsive group show greater attentional bias than the high impulsive group (faster RTs) at the 500 ms duration, indicating speeded detection of pictorial food cues. High-impulsives showed poorer response inhibition compared to low-impulsives following in-vivo food-cue exposure. Impulsivity did not significantly moderate the effect of in-vivo cue-exposure on desire-to-eat ratings. The evidence we obtained regarding inhibitory control following in vivo food cue exposure suggests that high-impulsive individuals may be prone to overeat when their reward systems are activated, a hypothesis that requires further confirmation.
冲动与奖赏性的趋食行为有关,例如对奖赏线索的敏感性增加。因此,冲动可能通过对奖赏性趋食线索的过度反应,使个体更容易增重。这种易感性应该可以通过对食物线索的更高认知和行为反应来检测,即对食物刺激的注意力偏向、主观欲望和抑制控制的丧失。我们通过测量低冲动和高冲动个体对急性、体内食物线索暴露的反应来检验这一假设。我们预计高冲动个体将:(1)在体内食物线索暴露后,对图片食物线索表现出更大的注意力偏向;(2)对高热量零食表现出更大的食欲反应;(3)与对照相比,在体内暴露后表现出较差的抑制控制。50 名女性参与者(25 岁±1.1;24kg/m2±0.6)随机分配到高热量食物线索暴露或食物中性对照条件下,随后完成食物线索视觉探测反应时任务、食欲状态的主观评分和停止信号任务。显著的组间-持续时间交互表明,与低冲动个体相比,高冲动个体对图片食物刺激的脱离(2000ms 持续时间的反应时较长)较慢。相反,低冲动组在 500ms 持续时间内比高冲动组表现出更大的注意力偏向(反应时更快),表明对图片食物线索的检测更快。与低冲动个体相比,高冲动个体在体内食物线索暴露后表现出较差的反应抑制。冲动并没有显著调节体内线索暴露对食欲评分的影响。我们在体内食物线索暴露后获得的关于抑制控制的证据表明,高冲动个体的奖励系统被激活时可能更容易暴饮暴食,这一假设需要进一步证实。