Meule Adrian, Kübler Andrea
Institute of Psychology, Department of Psychology I, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Hospital for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, LWL University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Hamm, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, Department of Psychology I, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Appetite. 2014 Aug;79:174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
Impulsivity and food craving have both been implicated in overeating. Recent results suggest that both processes may interactively predict increased food intake. In the present study, female participants performed a Go/No-go task with pictures of high- and low-calorie foods. They were instructed to press a button in response to the respective target category, but withhold responses to the other category. Target category was switched after every other block, thereby creating blocks in which stimulus-response mapping was the same as in the previous block (nonshift blocks) and blocks in which it was reversed (shift blocks). The Food Cravings Questionnaires and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale were used to assess trait and state food craving and attentional, motor, and nonplanning impulsivity. Participants had slower reaction times and more omission errors (OE) in high-calorie than in low-calorie blocks. Number of commission errors (CE) and OE was higher in shift blocks than in nonshift blocks. Trait impulsivity was positively correlated with CE in shift blocks while trait food craving was positively correlated with CE in high-calorie blocks. Importantly, CE in high-calorie-shift blocks were predicted by an interaction of food craving × impulsivity such that the relationship between food craving and CE was particularly strong at high levels of impulsivity, but vanished at low levels of impulsivity. Thus, impulsive reactions to high-calorie food-cues are particularly pronounced when both trait impulsivity and food craving is high, but low levels of impulsivity can compensate for high levels of trait food craving. Results support models of self-regulation which assume that interactive effects of low top-down control and strong reward sensitive, bottom-up mechanisms may determine eating-related disinhibition, ultimately leading to increased food intake.
冲动性和食物渴望都与暴饮暴食有关。最近的研究结果表明,这两个过程可能相互作用,预测食物摄入量的增加。在本研究中,女性参与者对高热量和低热量食物的图片执行了一项“是/否”任务。她们被指示根据各自的目标类别按下按钮,但对另一类别不做反应。每隔一个区块切换一次目标类别,从而创建刺激-反应映射与前一个区块相同的区块(非转换区块)和映射相反的区块(转换区块)。使用食物渴望问卷和巴拉特冲动性量表来评估特质和状态食物渴望以及注意力、运动和非计划性冲动性。与低热量区块相比,参与者在高热量区块的反应时间更慢,遗漏错误(OE)更多。转换区块中的错误行为(CE)和OE数量高于非转换区块。特质冲动性与转换区块中的CE呈正相关,而特质食物渴望与高热量区块中的CE呈正相关。重要的是,高热量转换区块中的CE由食物渴望×冲动性的相互作用预测,即食物渴望与CE之间的关系在高冲动性水平时特别强,但在低冲动性水平时消失。因此,当特质冲动性和食物渴望都很高时,对高热量食物线索的冲动反应尤为明显,但低水平的冲动性可以弥补高水平的特质食物渴望。研究结果支持自我调节模型,该模型假设低自上而下控制和强烈奖励敏感的自下而上机制的相互作用可能决定与饮食相关的去抑制,最终导致食物摄入量增加。