NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, London, UK.
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, London, UK.
J Hosp Infect. 2015 Jun;90(2):126-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.01.023. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
Improving behaviour in infection prevention and control (IPC) practice remains a challenge, and understanding the determinants of healthcare workers' (HCWs) behaviour is fundamental to develop effective and sustained behaviour change interventions.
To identify behaviours of HCWs that facilitated non-compliance with IPC practices, focusing on how appraisals of IPC duties and social and environmental circumstances shaped and influenced non-compliant behaviour. This study aimed to: (1) identify how HCWs rationalized their own behaviour and the behaviour of others; (2) highlight challenging areas of IPC compliance; and (3) describe the context of the working environment that may explain inconsistencies in IPC practices.
Clinical staff at a National Health Service hospital group in London, UK were interviewed between December 2010 and July 2011 using qualitative methods. Responses were analysed using a thematic framework.
Three ways in which HCWs appraised their behaviour were identified through accounts of IPC policies and practices: (1) attribution of responsibilities, with ambiguity about responsibility for certain IPC practices; (2) prioritization and risk appraisal, which demonstrated a divergence in values attached to some IPC policies and practices; and (3) hierarchy of influence highlighted that traditional clinical roles challenged work relationships.
Overall, behaviours are not entirely independent of policy rules, but often an amalgamation of local normative practices, individual preferences and a degree of professional isolation.
改善感染预防和控制(IPC)实践中的行为仍然是一个挑战,了解医护人员(HCWs)行为的决定因素对于开发有效和持续的行为改变干预措施至关重要。
确定促进 HCWs 不遵守 IPC 实践的行为,重点关注 IPC 职责的评估以及社会和环境情况如何塑造和影响不遵守行为。本研究旨在:(1)确定 HCWs 如何为自己和他人的行为辩护;(2)突出 IPC 合规性的挑战领域;(3)描述工作环境的背景,这可能可以解释 IPC 实践中的不一致性。
2010 年 12 月至 2011 年 7 月,使用定性方法对英国伦敦的一家国民保健服务医院集团的临床工作人员进行了访谈。使用主题框架对回复进行了分析。
通过对 IPC 政策和实践的描述,确定了 HCWs 评估其行为的三种方式:(1)责任归属,某些 IPC 实践的责任存在歧义;(2)优先级和风险评估,表明某些 IPC 政策和实践的价值观存在分歧;(3)强调影响层次的等级制度,传统的临床角色挑战了工作关系。
总体而言,行为并非完全独立于政策规则,而是通常是地方规范实践、个人偏好和一定程度的专业孤立的混合体。