• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更换健康保险公司:价格、质量与消费者信息搜索的作用

Switching health insurers: the role of price, quality and consumer information search.

作者信息

Boonen Lieke H H M, Laske-Aldershof Trea, Schut Frederik T

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Apr;17(3):339-53. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0681-1. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-015-0681-1
PMID:25820635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4805725/
Abstract

We examine the impact of price, service quality and information search on people's propensity to switch health insurers in the competitive Dutch health insurance market. Using panel data from annual household surveys and data on health insurers' premiums and quality ratings over the period 2006-2012, we estimate a random effects logit model of people's switching decisions. We find that switching propensities depend on health plan price and quality, and on people's age, health, education and having supplementary or group insurance. Young people (18-35 years) are more sensitive to price, whereas older people are more sensitive to quality. Searching for health plan information has a much stronger impact on peoples' sensitivity to price than to service quality. In addition, searching for health plan information has a stronger impact on the switching propensity of higher than lower educated people, suggesting that higher educated people make better use of available health plan information. Finally, having supplementary insurance significantly reduces older people's switching propensity.

摘要

我们研究了价格、服务质量和信息搜索对处于竞争状态的荷兰健康保险市场中人们更换健康保险公司倾向的影响。利用年度家庭调查的面板数据以及2006 - 2012年期间健康保险公司保费和质量评级的数据,我们估计了一个关于人们更换决策的随机效应logit模型。我们发现,更换倾向取决于健康计划的价格和质量,以及人们的年龄、健康状况、教育程度和是否拥有补充保险或团体保险。年轻人(18 - 35岁)对价格更为敏感,而老年人对质量更为敏感。搜索健康计划信息对人们价格敏感性的影响比对服务质量的影响要强得多。此外,搜索健康计划信息对受教育程度较高者更换倾向的影响比对受教育程度较低者的影响更强,这表明受教育程度较高的人能更好地利用现有的健康计划信息。最后,拥有补充保险显著降低了老年人的更换倾向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9af5/4805725/9558cdcf3f35/10198_2015_681_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9af5/4805725/a8fa2215d451/10198_2015_681_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9af5/4805725/9558cdcf3f35/10198_2015_681_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9af5/4805725/a8fa2215d451/10198_2015_681_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9af5/4805725/9558cdcf3f35/10198_2015_681_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Switching health insurers: the role of price, quality and consumer information search.更换健康保险公司:价格、质量与消费者信息搜索的作用
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Apr;17(3):339-53. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0681-1. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
2
Switching benefits and costs in competitive health insurance markets: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence from the Netherlands.竞争型健康保险市场中的收益与成本转换:来自荷兰的概念框架与实证证据
Health Policy. 2015 May;119(5):664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
3
Regulated competition in health care: switching and barriers to switching in the Dutch health insurance system.医疗保健的监管竞争:荷兰医疗保险体系中的转换和转换障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 10;11:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-95.
4
Supplementary insurance as a switching cost for basic health insurance: Empirical results from the Netherlands.补充保险作为基本医疗保险的转换成本:来自荷兰的实证结果。
Health Policy. 2017 Oct;121(10):1085-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
5
Switching gains and health plan price elasticities: 20 years of managed competition reforms in The Netherlands.转换收益和健康计划价格弹性:荷兰 20 年的管理竞争改革。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Nov;18(8):1047-1064. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0876-8. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
Consumer price sensitivity in Dutch health insurance.荷兰医疗保险中的消费者价格敏感度。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2008 Dec;8(4):225-44. doi: 10.1007/s10754-008-9038-y. Epub 2008 Aug 17.
7
Managed competition and consumer price sensitivity in social health insurance.社会医疗保险中的管理式竞争与消费者价格敏感性
J Health Econ. 2002 Nov;21(6):1009-29. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00055-3.
8
What drives insurer participation and premiums in the Federally-Facilitated Marketplace?是什么推动保险公司参与联邦政府推动的医保市场并确定保费?
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2017 Dec;17(4):395-412. doi: 10.1007/s10754-017-9215-y. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
9
Switching costs in competitive health insurance markets: The role of insurers' pricing strategies.竞争型医疗保险市场中的转换成本:保险公司定价策略的作用。
Health Econ. 2020 Sep;29(9):992-1012. doi: 10.1002/hec.4111. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
10
Switching rates in health insurance markets decrease with age: empirical evidence and policy implications from the Netherlands.医疗保险市场中的转换率随年龄增长而下降:来自荷兰的实证证据及政策启示。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Apr;11(2):141-59. doi: 10.1017/S1744133115000328. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting online health information-seeking behavior in young and middle-aged patients with stroke.影响中青年中风患者在线健康信息寻求行为的因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0321791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321791. eCollection 2025.
2
Adverse selection and consumer inertia: empirical evidence from the Dutch health insurance market.逆向选择与消费者惰性:来自荷兰健康保险市场的实证证据
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Jun;26(4):641-651. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01725-8. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Does supplementary health insurance play a role in the switching behaviour of citizens in the Netherlands?

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts.医疗保险市场中的逆向选择和惯性:当推动反而有害。
Am Econ Rev. 2013 Dec;103(7):2643-82. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.7.2643.
2
Plan selection in Medicare Part D: evidence from administrative data.医疗保险D部分的计划选择:来自行政数据的证据
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1325-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.06.006.
3
Risk equalization in The Netherlands: an empirical evaluation.荷兰的风险均等化:实证评估
补充医疗保险在荷兰公民的转换行为中是否发挥作用?
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2021 Dec 15;10(1):2015863. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2021.2015863. eCollection 2022.
4
The Importance of Choosing a Health Insurance Policy and the Ability to Comprehend That Choice for Citizens in the Netherlands.荷兰公民选择健康保险政策的重要性以及理解这种选择的能力。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Oct;5(4):e288-e294. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20211010-01. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries.定性探究影响医疗保险受益人计划选择过程的因素。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar;27(3):339-353. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.339.
6
Power and Purchasing: Why Strategic Purchasing Fails.权力与采购:战略采购为何失败。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):975-1020. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12471. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
Switching costs in competitive health insurance markets: The role of insurers' pricing strategies.竞争型医疗保险市场中的转换成本:保险公司定价策略的作用。
Health Econ. 2020 Sep;29(9):992-1012. doi: 10.1002/hec.4111. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
Does the chronically ill population in the Netherlands switch their health insurer as often as the general population? Empirical evidence from a nationwide survey study.荷兰的慢性病患者是否像一般人群一样经常更换健康保险公司?一项全国性调查研究的实证证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 5;20(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05228-z.
9
Is There A Non-Essential Hospitalization Day In Inpatients With Diabetes Under Medical Insurance? Evidence From An Observational Study In China.医疗保险覆盖的糖尿病住院患者中是否存在非必要住院日?来自中国一项观察性研究的证据。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019 Nov 6;12:2309-2316. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S220238. eCollection 2019.
10
Switching benefits and costs in the Irish health insurance market: an analysis of consumer surveys.爱尔兰健康保险市场中的收益与成本转换:消费者调查分析
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2019 Mar;19(1):15-32. doi: 10.1007/s10754-018-9244-1. Epub 2018 May 10.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Dec;13(6):829-39. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2013.842127. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
4
Choice of insurer for basic health insurance restricted by supplementary insurance.补充保险限制基本医疗保险的承保公司选择。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Sep;15(7):737-46. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0519-7. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
5
Regulating the NHS market in England.规范英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)市场。
BMJ. 2013 Mar 11;346:f1608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1608.
6
Preconditions for efficiency and affordability in competitive healthcare markets: are they fulfilled in Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands and Switzerland?竞争性医疗保健市场中效率和可负担性的前提条件:在比利时、德国、以色列、荷兰和瑞士是否得到满足?
Health Policy. 2013 Mar;109(3):226-45. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
7
The vast majority of Medicare Part D beneficiaries still don't choose the cheapest plans that meet their medication needs.绝大多数 Medicare Part D 受益人的药物需求仍未得到满足,他们没有选择最廉价的计划。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Oct;31(10):2259-65. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0087.
8
Growth of consumer-directed health plans to one-half of all employer-sponsored insurance could save $57 billion annually.如果消费者导向型医疗保险(consumer-directed health plans)能够增长至雇主赞助保险的一半,那么每年可节省 570 亿美元。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):1009-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0369.
9
Comparison friction: experimental evidence from medicare drug plans.比较摩擦:来自医疗保险药品计划的实验证据。
Q J Econ. 2012;127(1):199-235. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr055.
10
The price sensitivity of Medicare beneficiaries: a regression discontinuity approach.医疗保险受益人的价格敏感度:一种回归不连续性方法。
Health Econ. 2013 Jan;22(1):35-51. doi: 10.1002/hec.1814. Epub 2012 Jan 25.