Suppr超能文献

定性探究影响医疗保险受益人计划选择过程的因素。

Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries.

机构信息

Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar;27(3):339-353. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.339.

Abstract

Because Medicare plan coverage and costs change annually and older adults, the major beneficiaries of Medicare, are faced with multiple health conditions and changing medical needs, Medicare beneficiaries should evaluate their options during open enrollment every year. However, because of the complexity of plan selection, it may be challenging for Medicare beneficiaries to make an appropriate decision from among competing options. To (a) identify factors that beneficiaries consider having influenced their plan selection decision and (b) describe the decision-making process according to the consumer decision-making model (CDM). The 2 research questions guiding this study included (a) factors Medicare beneficiaries considered having influenced their Medicare plan selection decision and (b) characteristics of decision-making processes employed by Medicare beneficiaries. This is a phenomenological qualitative study. Semistructured in-person or telephone interviews with Alabama residents who have Medicare as the sole insurance provider were conducted between June and August 2019. Participant recruitment continued until reaching the saturation point. Each interview session consisted of structured questions identifying characteristics of participants and open-ended questions used to elicit participant Medicare plan decisionmaking process and factors affecting their decision. Data were analyzed using content analysis with a process of qualitative inductive coding. Twenty participants were interviewed. Twenty codes were identified and categorized into 5 themes regarding the factors influencing plan selection decisions by beneficiaries. When making a plan selection, participants were influenced by plan attributes (including cost, coverage, access to doctors, region, quality rating, and transportation); information resources and personal assistance; knowledge about Medicare; status and changes in personal situation; and experience with Medicare. Additionally, we identified 7 codes relating to beneficiary characteristics during decision-making processes, including being proactive, setting priorities, limiting choices, evaluating plans against personal needs, acquiescing to recommendations, sticking to the status quo, and weighing trade-offs. We consulted the CDM and created a conceptual model demonstrating a 5-step Medicare plan selection decision-making process and the factors influencing that process. This study was supported by the Auburn University Undergraduate Research Program. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. This study created a step-by-step decision flowchart of Medicare plan selection to illustrate the complexity of the plan selection that Medicare beneficiaries must use. We uncovered the plan selection decision-making process among Medicare beneficiaries and factors affecting that process. Drawing from the CDM and the study findings, we developed a conceptual model. Findings will help researchers and community agencies target Medicare beneficiaries with different needs for assistance and design decision-making interventions/tools to help beneficiaries make rational decisions when selecting Medicare plans. These findings suggest that health care professionals should be involved in assistance programs to maximize efficiency of Medicare plan selection and to improve monitoring and consulting mechanisms to ensure the reliability of assistance information and services.

摘要

由于医疗保险计划的覆盖范围和费用每年都在变化,而医疗保险的主要受益人是老年人,他们面临着多种健康状况和不断变化的医疗需求,因此,医疗保险受益人每年都应该在开放注册期间评估自己的选择。然而,由于计划选择的复杂性,对于医疗保险受益人来说,从竞争方案中做出适当的决策可能具有挑战性。本研究的 2 个研究问题包括:(a)确定受益人认为影响其计划选择决策的因素;(b)根据消费者决策模型(CDM)描述决策过程。这项研究采用现象学定性研究方法。2019 年 6 月至 8 月期间,对阿拉巴马州的居民进行了半结构化的现场或电话访谈,这些居民仅将医疗保险作为唯一的保险提供者。参与者的招募持续到达到饱和点。每次访谈都包括确定参与者特征的结构化问题和用于引出参与者医疗保险计划决策过程和影响其决策的因素的开放式问题。使用内容分析对数据进行分析,并采用定性归纳编码的过程。共对 20 名参与者进行了访谈。确定了 20 个代码,并将其分为 5 个主题,主题涉及受益人对计划选择决策的影响因素。在做出计划选择时,参与者受计划属性(包括成本、覆盖范围、医生的可及性、地区、质量评级和交通)、信息资源和个人援助、对医疗保险的了解、个人状况的变化和变化的影响、以及对医疗保险的经验。此外,我们还确定了 7 个与决策过程中受益人的特征相关的代码,包括积极主动、设定优先级、限制选择、根据个人需求评估计划、听从建议、坚持现状和权衡取舍。我们参考了消费者决策模型,并创建了一个概念模型,展示了 5 步医疗保险计划选择决策过程以及影响该过程的因素。本研究得到了奥本大学本科生研究计划的支持。作者没有利益冲突。本研究创建了一个逐步的 Medicare 计划选择决策流程图,以说明 Medicare 受益人必须使用的计划选择的复杂性。我们发现了 Medicare 受益人的计划选择决策过程以及影响该过程的因素。借鉴消费者决策模型和研究结果,我们开发了一个概念模型。研究结果将帮助研究人员和社区机构针对不同需求的 Medicare 受益人提供帮助,并设计决策干预措施/工具,以帮助受益人在选择 Medicare 计划时做出合理决策。这些发现表明,医疗保健专业人员应参与援助计划,以最大限度地提高 Medicare 计划选择的效率,并改进监测和咨询机制,以确保援助信息和服务的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar;27(3):339-353. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.339.
2
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Insurance knowledge and decision-making practices among Medicare beneficiaries and their caregivers.
Med Care. 2004 Nov;42(11):1091-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200411000-00008.
8
Medicare beneficiary knowledge of the Part D program and its relationship with voluntary enrollment.
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2012 Dec 12;2(4). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a03. eCollection 2012.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Sep;31(9):868-878. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.9.868.
2
Therapeutic horizons in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis.
J Clin Invest. 2025 Jul 1;135(13). doi: 10.1172/JCI186425.
3
Growth Of Chronic Condition Special Needs Plans Among Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries, 2011-24.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2025 Mar;44(3):304-312. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00651.

本文引用的文献

2
Patient Experiences in Selecting a Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan.
J Patient Exp. 2018 Jun;5(2):147-152. doi: 10.1177/2374373517739413. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
3
Multimorbidity and Decision-Making Preferences Among Older Adults.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Nov;15(6):546-551. doi: 10.1370/afm.2106.
5
Does the Medicare Part D Decision-Making Experience Differ by Rural/Urban Location?
J Rural Health. 2017 Jan;33(1):12-20. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12175. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Switching rates in health insurance markets decrease with age: empirical evidence and policy implications from the Netherlands.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Apr;11(2):141-59. doi: 10.1017/S1744133115000328. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Switching health insurers: the role of price, quality and consumer information search.
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Apr;17(3):339-53. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0681-1. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
8
Plan selection in Medicare Part D: evidence from administrative data.
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1325-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.06.006.
9
The role of satisfaction and switching costs in Medicare Part D choices.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Mar-Apr;10(2):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
10
Pharmacy students teaching prescribers strategies to lower prescription drug costs for underserved patients.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Sep;19(7):534-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.7.534.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验