• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries.定性探究影响医疗保险受益人计划选择过程的因素。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar;27(3):339-353. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.339.
2
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.成本和质量信息在医疗保险优势计划参保决策中的作用:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
3
Association of Health Insurance Literacy With Enrollment in Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Plan Characteristics Within Medicare Advantage.健康保险素养与传统医疗保险、医疗保险优势计划和医疗保险优势计划内计划特征的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46792.
4
Determinants of Medicare plan choices: are beneficiaries more influenced by premiums or benefits?医疗保险计划选择的决定因素:受益人受保费还是福利的影响更大?
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jul;21(7):498-504.
5
Insurance knowledge and decision-making practices among Medicare beneficiaries and their caregivers.医疗保险受益人与他们的护理人员的保险知识及决策行为。
Med Care. 2004 Nov;42(11):1091-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200411000-00008.
6
Implementation of a Medicare Plan Selection Assistance Program Through a Community Partnership.通过社区合作实施医疗保险计划选择援助计划。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Nov;82(9):6452. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6452.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Medicare beneficiary knowledge of the Part D program and its relationship with voluntary enrollment.医疗保险受益人对D部分计划的了解及其与自愿参保的关系。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2012 Dec 12;2(4). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a03. eCollection 2012.
9
An overview and study of beneficiaries' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of the medicare part d benefit.医疗保险D部分受益人的知识、态度及认知概述与研究
Consult Pharm. 2015 Feb;30(2):101-11. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2015.101..
10
Development of a medicare beneficiary comprehension test: assessing medicare part d beneficiaries' comprehension of their benefits.医疗保险受益人理解测试的开发:评估医疗保险D部分受益人对其福利的理解
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013 Sep;6(8):453-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool.应对复杂性:一款用户友好型医疗保险D部分患者决策辅助工具的开发与试点测试
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Sep;31(9):868-878. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.9.868.
2
Therapeutic horizons in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis.代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎的治疗前景
J Clin Invest. 2025 Jul 1;135(13). doi: 10.1172/JCI186425.
3
Growth Of Chronic Condition Special Needs Plans Among Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries, 2011-24.2011 - 2024年双重资格受益人群中慢性病特殊需求计划的发展情况
Health Aff (Millwood). 2025 Mar;44(3):304-312. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00651.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of a Medicare Plan Selection Assistance Program Through a Community Partnership.通过社区合作实施医疗保险计划选择援助计划。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Nov;82(9):6452. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6452.
2
Patient Experiences in Selecting a Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan.患者选择医疗保险D部分处方药计划的经历。
J Patient Exp. 2018 Jun;5(2):147-152. doi: 10.1177/2374373517739413. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
3
Multimorbidity and Decision-Making Preferences Among Older Adults.老年人的多种并存疾病与决策偏好。
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Nov;15(6):546-551. doi: 10.1370/afm.2106.
4
How Do Pharmacists Assist Medicare Beneficiaries with Limited Income? A Cross-Sectional Study of Community Pharmacies in Alabama.药剂师如何帮助收入有限的 Medicare 受益人?阿拉巴马州社区药房的横断面研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Sep;22(9):1039-45. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.9.1039.
5
Does the Medicare Part D Decision-Making Experience Differ by Rural/Urban Location?医疗保险D部分的决策体验在农村/城市地区是否存在差异?
J Rural Health. 2017 Jan;33(1):12-20. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12175. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Switching rates in health insurance markets decrease with age: empirical evidence and policy implications from the Netherlands.医疗保险市场中的转换率随年龄增长而下降:来自荷兰的实证证据及政策启示。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Apr;11(2):141-59. doi: 10.1017/S1744133115000328. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Switching health insurers: the role of price, quality and consumer information search.更换健康保险公司:价格、质量与消费者信息搜索的作用
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Apr;17(3):339-53. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0681-1. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
8
Plan selection in Medicare Part D: evidence from administrative data.医疗保险D部分的计划选择:来自行政数据的证据
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1325-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.06.006.
9
The role of satisfaction and switching costs in Medicare Part D choices.满意度和转换成本在医疗保险D部分选择中的作用。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Mar-Apr;10(2):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
10
Pharmacy students teaching prescribers strategies to lower prescription drug costs for underserved patients.药学专业学生向开处方者传授为服务不足的患者降低处方药成本的策略。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Sep;19(7):534-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.7.534.

定性探究影响医疗保险受益人计划选择过程的因素。

Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries.

机构信息

Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar;27(3):339-353. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.339.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.339
PMID:33645247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10391224/
Abstract

Because Medicare plan coverage and costs change annually and older adults, the major beneficiaries of Medicare, are faced with multiple health conditions and changing medical needs, Medicare beneficiaries should evaluate their options during open enrollment every year. However, because of the complexity of plan selection, it may be challenging for Medicare beneficiaries to make an appropriate decision from among competing options. To (a) identify factors that beneficiaries consider having influenced their plan selection decision and (b) describe the decision-making process according to the consumer decision-making model (CDM). The 2 research questions guiding this study included (a) factors Medicare beneficiaries considered having influenced their Medicare plan selection decision and (b) characteristics of decision-making processes employed by Medicare beneficiaries. This is a phenomenological qualitative study. Semistructured in-person or telephone interviews with Alabama residents who have Medicare as the sole insurance provider were conducted between June and August 2019. Participant recruitment continued until reaching the saturation point. Each interview session consisted of structured questions identifying characteristics of participants and open-ended questions used to elicit participant Medicare plan decisionmaking process and factors affecting their decision. Data were analyzed using content analysis with a process of qualitative inductive coding. Twenty participants were interviewed. Twenty codes were identified and categorized into 5 themes regarding the factors influencing plan selection decisions by beneficiaries. When making a plan selection, participants were influenced by plan attributes (including cost, coverage, access to doctors, region, quality rating, and transportation); information resources and personal assistance; knowledge about Medicare; status and changes in personal situation; and experience with Medicare. Additionally, we identified 7 codes relating to beneficiary characteristics during decision-making processes, including being proactive, setting priorities, limiting choices, evaluating plans against personal needs, acquiescing to recommendations, sticking to the status quo, and weighing trade-offs. We consulted the CDM and created a conceptual model demonstrating a 5-step Medicare plan selection decision-making process and the factors influencing that process. This study was supported by the Auburn University Undergraduate Research Program. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. This study created a step-by-step decision flowchart of Medicare plan selection to illustrate the complexity of the plan selection that Medicare beneficiaries must use. We uncovered the plan selection decision-making process among Medicare beneficiaries and factors affecting that process. Drawing from the CDM and the study findings, we developed a conceptual model. Findings will help researchers and community agencies target Medicare beneficiaries with different needs for assistance and design decision-making interventions/tools to help beneficiaries make rational decisions when selecting Medicare plans. These findings suggest that health care professionals should be involved in assistance programs to maximize efficiency of Medicare plan selection and to improve monitoring and consulting mechanisms to ensure the reliability of assistance information and services.

摘要

由于医疗保险计划的覆盖范围和费用每年都在变化,而医疗保险的主要受益人是老年人,他们面临着多种健康状况和不断变化的医疗需求,因此,医疗保险受益人每年都应该在开放注册期间评估自己的选择。然而,由于计划选择的复杂性,对于医疗保险受益人来说,从竞争方案中做出适当的决策可能具有挑战性。本研究的 2 个研究问题包括:(a)确定受益人认为影响其计划选择决策的因素;(b)根据消费者决策模型(CDM)描述决策过程。这项研究采用现象学定性研究方法。2019 年 6 月至 8 月期间,对阿拉巴马州的居民进行了半结构化的现场或电话访谈,这些居民仅将医疗保险作为唯一的保险提供者。参与者的招募持续到达到饱和点。每次访谈都包括确定参与者特征的结构化问题和用于引出参与者医疗保险计划决策过程和影响其决策的因素的开放式问题。使用内容分析对数据进行分析,并采用定性归纳编码的过程。共对 20 名参与者进行了访谈。确定了 20 个代码,并将其分为 5 个主题,主题涉及受益人对计划选择决策的影响因素。在做出计划选择时,参与者受计划属性(包括成本、覆盖范围、医生的可及性、地区、质量评级和交通)、信息资源和个人援助、对医疗保险的了解、个人状况的变化和变化的影响、以及对医疗保险的经验。此外,我们还确定了 7 个与决策过程中受益人的特征相关的代码,包括积极主动、设定优先级、限制选择、根据个人需求评估计划、听从建议、坚持现状和权衡取舍。我们参考了消费者决策模型,并创建了一个概念模型,展示了 5 步医疗保险计划选择决策过程以及影响该过程的因素。本研究得到了奥本大学本科生研究计划的支持。作者没有利益冲突。本研究创建了一个逐步的 Medicare 计划选择决策流程图,以说明 Medicare 受益人必须使用的计划选择的复杂性。我们发现了 Medicare 受益人的计划选择决策过程以及影响该过程的因素。借鉴消费者决策模型和研究结果,我们开发了一个概念模型。研究结果将帮助研究人员和社区机构针对不同需求的 Medicare 受益人提供帮助,并设计决策干预措施/工具,以帮助受益人在选择 Medicare 计划时做出合理决策。这些发现表明,医疗保健专业人员应参与援助计划,以最大限度地提高 Medicare 计划选择的效率,并改进监测和咨询机制,以确保援助信息和服务的可靠性。