Xiao Xiao, McGlinn Daniel J, White Ethan P
Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322; and Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322.
Am Nat. 2015 Mar;185(3):E70-80. doi: 10.1086/679576.
The maximum entropy theory of ecology (METE) is a unified theory of biodiversity that predicts a large number of macroecological patterns using information on only species richness, total abundance, and total metabolic rate of the community. We evaluated four major predictions of METE simultaneously at an unprecedented scale using data from 60 globally distributed forest communities including more than 300,000 individuals and nearly 2,000 species.METE successfully captured 96% and 89% of the variation in the rank distribution of species abundance and individual size but performed poorly when characterizing the size-density relationship and intraspecific distribution of individual size. Specifically, METE predicted a negative correlation between size and species abundance, which is weak in natural communities. By evaluating multiple predictions with large quantities of data, our study not only identifies a mismatch between abundance and body size in METE but also demonstrates the importance of conducting strong tests of ecological theories.
生态学最大熵理论(METE)是一种生物多样性统一理论,它仅利用群落的物种丰富度、总丰度和总代谢率信息就能预测大量宏观生态模式。我们以前所未有的规模,利用来自全球60个森林群落的数据,同时评估了METE的四个主要预测,这些数据包括30多万个个体和近2000个物种。METE成功捕捉到了物种丰度和个体大小等级分布中96%和89%的变异,但在描述大小-密度关系和个体大小的种内分布时表现不佳。具体而言,METE预测大小与物种丰度之间呈负相关,而这在自然群落中很弱。通过用大量数据评估多个预测,我们的研究不仅发现了METE中丰度与体型之间的不匹配,还证明了对生态理论进行严格检验的重要性。