• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MISUNDERSTANDING, THREATS, AND FEAR, OF THE LAW IN CONFLICTS OVER CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE: IN THE MATTER OF ASHYA KING [2014] EWHC 2964.

作者信息

Bridgeman Jo

机构信息

Sussex Law School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QE, England

出版信息

Med Law Rev. 2015 Summer;23(3):477-89. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv006. Epub 2015 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1093/medlaw/fwv006
PMID:25823385
Abstract

This commentary critically examines the role of the law in the conflict over the post-operative care of five-year-old Ashya King. It argues that misunderstanding, threats, and fear of the law contributed to the deteriorating relationship between his parents and the professionals caring for him. The commentary analyses the judgment, in wardship proceedings, of Baker J arguing that too much weight was placed upon the responsibilities of Ashya's parents and an insufficient account provided of his best interests or of the principled basis for preferring innovative and, as yet, unproven therapy only available, privately funded, abroad to conventional treatment for a child with a life-threatening condition.

摘要

相似文献

1
MISUNDERSTANDING, THREATS, AND FEAR, OF THE LAW IN CONFLICTS OVER CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE: IN THE MATTER OF ASHYA KING [2014] EWHC 2964.
Med Law Rev. 2015 Summer;23(3):477-89. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv006. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
2
A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?是否存在显著危害的阈值(f)或可行的替代治疗方案?
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jul;44(7):466-470. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104720. Epub 2018 May 3.
3
Medical Tourism and the Best Interests of the Critically ill Child in the Era of Healthcare Globalisation.医疗旅游与全球化医疗时代重症儿童的最佳利益
Med Law Rev. 2020 Dec 17;28(4):696-730. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwaa029.
4
Mental capacity and professional advice in a patient with dysphagia.吞咽困难患者的精神能力与专业建议
Br J Nurs. 2006;15(10):574-5. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2006.15.10.21135.
5
Advance care planning for children with special health care needs: a survey of parental attitudes.为有特殊医疗需求的儿童进行预先护理规划:家长态度调查
Pediatrics. 1996 May;97(5):682-7.
6
Parents and medical professionals: conflict, cooperation, and best interests.父母与医学专业人员:冲突、合作与最大利益。
Med Law Rev. 2012 Winter;20(1):29-44. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwr037.
7
How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement.我们应该如何在意见分歧的情况下决定如何治疗孩子:权衡伤害与最佳利益。
Med Law Rev. 2024 May 28;32(2):158-177. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad040.
8
Whose child is it anyway? Resolving parent-physician conflict in the NICU setting.这孩子到底是谁的?解决新生儿重症监护室中父母与医生的冲突。
Am J Perinatol. 2003 Oct;20(7):373-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-45284.
9
Sources of conflict between families and health care professionals.家庭与医疗保健专业人员之间的冲突根源。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;23(2):82-91. doi: 10.1177/1043454205285871.
10
Court can make parental decisions.
Bull Med Ethics. 2003 Nov(193):4.

引用本文的文献

1
Parent and medical team disagreements in the UK: universal lessons in the origins and resolution in conflict.英国父母与医疗团队的分歧:冲突起源与解决中的普遍教训
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022 Nov 4;2(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00075-2.