Suppr超能文献

电生理研究在不明原因晕厥患者管理中的作用。

The role of electrophysiologic studies in the management of patients with unexplained syncope.

作者信息

Denes P, Ezri M D

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1985 May;8(3 Pt 1):424-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1985.tb05782.x.

Abstract

We evaluated the frequency and type of electrophysiologic abnormalities in an unselected population of consecutive patients with unexplained syncope. Fifty patients were entered in the study; all had 24-hour dynamic electrocardiographic (Holter) recordings and underwent complete electrophysiological studies. An abnormal electrophysiologic study was found in 74% of the patients. Sinus node abnormality was observed in 30%, abnormal AV node function in 14%, long HV in 10%, block distal to H during rapid atrial pacing in 6%, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in 12%, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in 8%, and hypersensitive carotid sinus syndrome in 24%. There was no correlation between Holter and electrophysiologic study findings except for the presence of paroxysmal sustained supraventricular tachycardia. Based on clinical, Holter monitoring, and electrophysiologic findings, 38% were treated by antiarrhythmic drugs, 40% received permanent pacemakers, and 22% were not treated at all. During follow-up (23 +/- 13 months), 9 patients (18%) experienced recurrent syncope or death.

摘要

我们评估了一组未经挑选的、连续的不明原因晕厥患者的电生理异常的频率和类型。50名患者进入该研究;所有人均进行了24小时动态心电图(Holter)记录,并接受了完整的电生理检查。74%的患者存在异常电生理检查结果。30%观察到窦房结异常,14%存在房室结功能异常,10%有HV间期延长,6%在快速心房起搏时H波远端阻滞,12%有阵发性室上性心动过速,8%有室性心动过速/心室颤动,24%有高敏性颈动脉窦综合征。除阵发性持续性室上性心动过速外,Holter与电生理检查结果之间无相关性。根据临床、Holter监测和电生理检查结果,38%的患者接受抗心律失常药物治疗,40%接受永久性起搏器治疗,22%根本未接受治疗。在随访期间(23±13个月),9名患者(18%)出现复发性晕厥或死亡。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验