Suppr超能文献

[不明原因晕厥患者的电生理研究]

[Electrophysiologic study in patients with syncope of unknown cause].

作者信息

Gössinger H, Siostrzonek P, Kyrle P A, Hainz A, Schwarzinger I, Schmoliner R, Mösslacher H

机构信息

I. Med. Univ.-Klinik Wien, Kardiologische Abteilung.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1988 Jul;77(7):444-51.

PMID:3213147
Abstract

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 51 patients with syncopes of unexplained origin. 25 patients (49%) had organic heart disease. Electrophysiologic testing included determination of corrected sinus node recovery time, AV-nodal effective refractory period, AH- and HV-intervals, and AV-nodal Wenckebach rate. During programmed right ventricular stimulation, 1-3 premature stimuli were used. 26 patients (53%) had an abnormal outcome that strongly suggested an arrhythmogenic cause of the reported syncopes. In ten patients (20%), corrected sinus node recovery time was prolonged; AV-nodal conduction disturbance was manifest in two patients (4%); reversibility with atropine was shown in one patient. Six patients (12%) had an infrahisian conduction delay with an HV-interval longer than 70 ms. Eight patients (15.6%) had either symptomatic ventricular tachycardias (n = 4), AV-nodal reentry tachycardias (n = 2), or inducible symptomatic rapid atrial fibrillation (n = 2). In one additional patient, ventricular tachycardias could not be reinitiated after ending tricyclic antidepressant drug medication. The diagnostic yield of the electrophysiologic study was not influenced by the presence of organic heart disease. Patients with prolonged corrected sinus node recovery time, prolonged HV-interval, and irreversible AV-conduction delay underwent pacemaker implantation (n = 17). Patients with rapid response to programmed stimulation received antiarrhythmic medication, the efficacy of which was assessed by serial electrophysiologic testing until non-inducibility was obtained. The mean follow-up period was 11 months (1-31 months). Overall 2-year mortality was 17%. In 4/5 patients, death was unrelated to the cause of syncope.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对51例不明原因晕厥患者进行了电生理研究。25例患者(49%)患有器质性心脏病。电生理检查包括测定校正窦房结恢复时间、房室结有效不应期、AH间期和HV间期以及房室结文氏率。在程控右心室刺激过程中,使用1 - 3个期前刺激。26例患者(53%)的检查结果异常,强烈提示所报告晕厥的心律失常原因。10例患者(20%)校正窦房结恢复时间延长;2例患者(4%)出现房室结传导障碍;1例患者显示对阿托品有反应。6例患者(12%)希氏束下传导延迟,HV间期超过70毫秒。8例患者(15.6%)有症状性室性心动过速(4例)、房室结折返性心动过速(2例)或可诱发的症状性快速心房颤动(2例)。另外1例患者在停用三环类抗抑郁药后室性心动过速无法再次诱发。电生理研究的诊断率不受器质性心脏病的影响。校正窦房结恢复时间延长、HV间期延长和不可逆性房室传导延迟的患者接受了起搏器植入(17例)。对程控刺激反应快速的患者接受了抗心律失常药物治疗,通过系列电生理检查评估其疗效,直至无法诱发心律失常。平均随访期为11个月(1 - 31个月)。总体2年死亡率为17%。在5例患者中有4例,死亡与晕厥原因无关。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验