Suppr超能文献

学术动机量表的土耳其语版本。

Turkish version of the Academic Motivation Scale.

作者信息

Can Gürhan

机构信息

1 Psychological Counseling Department, Yeditepe University.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2015 Apr;116(2):388-408. doi: 10.2466/14.08.PR0.116k24w5. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to adapt the college version of the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) into Turkish. The participants were 797 college students (437 men, 360 women) with a mean age of 20.1 yr. A seven-factor model of the scale, as well as alternative models (five-, three-, two-, and one-factor models) were investigated and compared through confirmatory factor analysis. The seven-factor model demonstrated adequate fit to the data. The fit indices obtained from the five-factor model were acceptable also. Hancock's coefficient H values and test-retest correlation coefficients of the subscales indicated that reliability of the scale was adequate except for the identified regulation subscale. The CFA conducted for the groups of men and women produced more acceptable fit indices values for men than women, but women obtained significantly higher scores from the AMS subscales. Correlations among the seven subscales partially supported the simplex pattern which claims that the neighboring subscales should have stronger positive correlations than the non-neighboring subscales and that the subscales which are the farthest apart should have the strongest negative relationships.

摘要

本研究的目的是将大学版的学术动机量表(AMS)改编为土耳其语版本。参与者为797名大学生(437名男性,360名女性),平均年龄20.1岁。通过验证性因素分析对该量表的七因素模型以及替代模型(五因素、三因素、二因素和单因素模型)进行了研究和比较。七因素模型对数据显示出充分的拟合度。从五因素模型获得的拟合指数也可以接受。分量表的汉考克系数H值和重测相关系数表明,除了已识别的调节分量表外,该量表的信度是足够的。对男性和女性组进行的验证性因素分析产生的拟合指数值,男性比女性更可接受,但女性在AMS分量表上获得的分数显著更高。七个分量表之间的相关性部分支持了单维模式,该模式认为相邻的分量表应该比不相邻的分量表具有更强的正相关,而相距最远的分量表应该具有最强的负相关关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验