• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻人和年长者以相似的方式权衡多种线索,以形成对学习的判断。

Younger and older adults weigh multiple cues in a similar manner to generate judgments of learning.

作者信息

Hines Jarrod C, Hertzog Christopher, Touron Dayna R

机构信息

a School of Psychology , Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta , GA , USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2015;22(6):693-711. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1028884. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1080/13825585.2015.1028884
PMID:25827630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4537673/
Abstract

One's memory for past test performance (MPT) is a key piece of information individuals use when deciding how to restudy material. We used a multi-trial recognition memory task to examine adult age differences in the influence of MPT (measured by actual Trial 1 memory accuracy and subjective confidence judgments, CJs) along with Trial 1 judgments of learning (JOLs), objective and participant-estimated recognition fluencies, and Trial 2 study time on Trial 2 JOLs. We found evidence of simultaneous and independent influences of multiple objective and subjective (i.e., metacognitive) cues on Trial 2 JOLs, and these relationships were highly similar for younger and older adults. Individual differences in Trial 1 recognition accuracy and CJs on Trial 2 JOLs indicate that individuals may vary in the degree to which they rely on each MPT cue when assessing subsequent memory confidence. Aging appears to spare the ability to access multiple cues when making JOLs.

摘要

一个人对过去测试表现的记忆(MPT)是个体在决定如何重新学习材料时所使用的关键信息。我们使用了一个多试验识别记忆任务,来检验成人在MPT影响方面的年龄差异(通过实际的第一次试验记忆准确性和主观信心判断,即CJs来衡量),以及第一次试验的学习判断(JOLs)、客观和参与者估计的识别流畅性,和第二次试验学习时间对第二次试验JOLs的影响。我们发现了多个客观和主观(即元认知)线索对第二次试验JOLs同时且独立影响的证据,并且这些关系在年轻人和老年人中高度相似。第一次试验识别准确性和第二次试验JOLs上的CJs的个体差异表明,个体在评估后续记忆信心时,依赖每个MPT线索的程度可能有所不同。衰老似乎并未损害做出JOLs时获取多个线索的能力。

相似文献

1
Younger and older adults weigh multiple cues in a similar manner to generate judgments of learning.年轻人和年长者以相似的方式权衡多种线索,以形成对学习的判断。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2015;22(6):693-711. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1028884. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
2
Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Multiple Cues In Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy.除了对过去测试准确性的记忆外,学习判断还受到多种线索的影响。
Arch Sci Psychol. 2013;1(1):23-32. doi: 10.1037/arc0000003.
3
Multiple bases for young and older adults' judgments of learning in multitrial learning.多试学习中年轻人和老年人学习判断的多种依据。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Jun;27(2):474-83. doi: 10.1037/a0025246. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
4
Metacognitive influences on study time allocation in an associative recognition task: An analysis of adult age differences.元认知对联想识别任务中学习时间分配的影响:成人年龄差异分析。
Psychol Aging. 2009 Jun;24(2):462-75. doi: 10.1037/a0014417.
5
Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.学习判断中多种线索的同时利用。
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):507-519. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0780-6.
6
Do judgments of learning modify older adults' actual learning?学习判断是否会改变老年人的实际学习情况?
Psychol Aging. 2019 Sep;34(6):836-847. doi: 10.1037/pag0000376. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
Are feeling-of-knowing and judgment-of-learning different? Evidence from older adults.知晓感和学习判断是否不同?来自老年人的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Mar;139(3):458-64. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
8
People use the memory for past-test heuristic as an explicit cue for judgments of learning.人们将对过去测试的记忆作为判断学习情况的明确线索。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1260-72. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0431-0.
9
Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.人们对于衰老过程中记忆衰退的看法并不会影响学习判断(JOL):这对基于信念的 JOL 解释构成了挑战。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Aug;47(6):1102-1119. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00919-3.
10
Age-related schema reliance of judgments of learning in predicting source memory.与年龄相关的图式依赖对学习判断预测源记忆的影响。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2012;19(1-2):301-18. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.632616. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Age differences in item selection behaviors and subsequent memory for new foreign language vocabulary: Evidence for a region of proximal learning heuristic.年龄对新项目选择行为及随后对外语词汇记忆的影响:近端学习启发式的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Dec;35(8):1059-1072. doi: 10.1037/pag0000574. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Age-related differences in metacognition for memory capacity and selectivity.与年龄相关的记忆容量和选择性元认知差异。
Memory. 2019 Oct;27(9):1236-1249. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1645859. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
3
Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.学习判断中多种线索的同时利用。
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):507-519. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0780-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Multiple Cues In Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy.除了对过去测试准确性的记忆外,学习判断还受到多种线索的影响。
Arch Sci Psychol. 2013;1(1):23-32. doi: 10.1037/arc0000003.
2
Measuring Memory Reactivation With Functional MRI: Implications for Psychological Theory.利用功能磁共振成像测量记忆再激活:对心理理论的启示。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan;8(1):72-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691612469031.
3
Domain-specific impairment in metacognitive accuracy following anterior prefrontal lesions.前额叶前部病变后元认知准确性的特定领域损伤。
Brain. 2014 Oct;137(Pt 10):2811-22. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu221. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
4
Test Framing Generates a Stability Bias for Predictions of Learning by Causing People to Discount their Learning Beliefs.测试框架会导致人们低估自己的学习信念,从而在学习预测中产生稳定性偏差。
J Mem Lang. 2014 Aug 1;75:181-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.06.003.
5
Type I error inflation in the traditional by-participant analysis to metamemory accuracy: a generalized mixed-effects model perspective.传统的按参与者分析中关于元记忆准确性的I型错误膨胀:广义混合效应模型视角。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1287-306. doi: 10.1037/a0036914. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
6
People use the memory for past-test heuristic as an explicit cue for judgments of learning.人们将对过去测试的记忆作为判断学习情况的明确线索。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1260-72. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0431-0.
7
Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition.超个人认知控制与元认知。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
8
Prefrontal cortex and executive functions in healthy adults: a meta-analysis of structural neuroimaging studies.健康成年人的前额叶皮层与执行功能:结构神经影像学研究的荟萃分析
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 May;42:180-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
9
The impact of age on load-related dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation.年龄对与负荷相关的背外侧前额叶皮层激活的影响。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Feb 5;6:9. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00009. eCollection 2014.
10
Metacognition in Later Adulthood: Spared Monitoring Can Benefit Older Adults' Self-regulation.成年后期的元认知:保留的监控能力有益于老年人的自我调节。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;20(3):167-173. doi: 10.1177/0963721411409026.