Suppr超能文献

同时启动计算机化的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗路径可减少非工作时间的门球时间,但不能降低死亡率。

Simultaneous computerised activation of the primary percutaneous coronary intervention pathway reduces out-of-hours door-to-balloon time but not mortality.

作者信息

Brown R A, Varma C, Connolly D L, Ahmad R, Shantsila E, Lip G Y H

机构信息

University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Cardiology Department at Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham and Sandwell Hospital, West Bromwich, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2015;186:226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.172. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2009 activation of out of hours (OOH) primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in our institution changed from separate telephone calls to a simultaneous computerised alert. We assessed the impact of this protocol change on door-to-balloon (DTB) time, in hospital and 1 year mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective survey of our Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) database. OOH patients were categorized--pre- (Group 1) and post- (Group 2) introduction of the computerised alert protocol.

RESULTS

OOH PPCI was performed for 793 patients (mean age 61, 73.4% male)--295 in Group 1 and 498 in Group 2. Median DTB times were 92 min (interquartile range [IQR] 75-111) for Group 1 and 76 min (IQR 64-97) for Group 2 (p < 0.0001). Forty-eight percent achieved DTB in ≤ 90 min in Group 1 compared to 70% in Group 2 (p < 0.0001). Computerised alert was associated with a shorter DTB time on multivariate analysis (beta coefficient -0.09, p = 0.03 for linear regression and OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6-5.0, p < 0.0001 for logistic regression). In hospital mortality was 4.1% in Group 1 and 5% in Group 2 (p = 0.60). All-cause mortality at 1 year was 6.1% in Group 1 and 9.9% in Group 2 (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous computerised activation for OOH PPCI reduced DTB times, increased the number of patients achieving target DTB times but did not affect mortality.

摘要

背景

2009年,我院非工作时间(OOH)的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的启动方式从单独电话通知改为同步电脑警报。我们评估了这一方案改变对门球时间(DTB)、住院期间及1年死亡率的影响。

方法

对我院心肌缺血国家审计项目(MINAP)数据库进行回顾性调查。将非工作时间的患者分为两组——电脑警报方案引入前(第1组)和引入后(第2组)。

结果

共对793例患者进行了非工作时间的PPCI(平均年龄61岁,73.4%为男性)——第1组295例,第2组498例。第1组的中位DTB时间为92分钟(四分位间距[IQR]75 - 111),第2组为76分钟(IQR 64 - 97)(p < 0.0001)。第1组48%的患者在≤90分钟内达到DTB时间,而第2组为70%(p < 0.0001)。多因素分析显示,电脑警报与较短的DTB时间相关(线性回归的β系数为-0.09,p = 0.03;逻辑回归的OR为2.8,95%CI为1.6 - 5.0,p < 0.0001)。第1组的住院死亡率为4.1%,第2组为5%(p = 0.60)。第1组1年的全因死亡率为6.1%,第2组为9.9%(p = 0.09)。

结论

非工作时间PPCI的同步电脑激活缩短了DTB时间,增加了达到目标DTB时间的患者数量,但未影响死亡率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验