Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Center for Outcomes & Evaluation (CORE), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jul;29(7):541-549. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010067. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
The degree to which elevated mortality associated with weekend or night-time hospital admissions reflects poorer quality of care ('off-hours effect') is a contentious issue. We examined if off-hours admissions for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) were associated with higher adjusted mortality and estimated the extent to which potential differences in door-to-balloon (DTB) times-a key indicator of care quality for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients-could explain this association.
Nationwide registry-based prospective observational study using Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project data in England. We examined how off-hours admissions and DTB times were associated with our primary outcome measure, 30-day mortality, using hierarchical logistic regression models that adjusted for STEMI patient risk factors. In-hospital mortality was assessed as a secondary outcome.
From 76 648 records of patients undergoing PPCI between January 2007 and December 2012, we included 42 677 admissions in our analysis. Fifty-six per cent of admissions for PPCI occurred during off-hours. PPCI admissions during off-hours were associated with a higher likelihood of adjusted 30-day mortality (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.25). The median DTB time was longer for off-hours admissions (45 min; IQR 30-68) than regular hours (38 min; IQR 27-58; p<0.001). After adjusting for DTB time, the difference in adjusted 30-day mortality between regular and off-hours admissions for PPCI was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (OR 1.08; CI 0.97 to 1.20).
Higher adjusted mortality associated with off-hours admissions for PPCI could be partly explained by differences in DTB times. Further investigations to understand the off-hours effect should focus on conditions likely to be sensitive to the rapid availability of services, where timeliness of care is a significant determinant of outcomes.
与周末或夜间住院相关的死亡率升高反映了护理质量较差(“非工作时间效应”)的程度,这是一个有争议的问题。我们研究了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的非工作时间入院是否与更高的调整后死亡率相关,并估计了门球时间(DTB)差异(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 [STEMI] 患者护理质量的关键指标)可能解释这种关联的程度。
使用英格兰心肌缺血国家审计项目数据进行基于全国登记的前瞻性观察性研究。我们使用层次逻辑回归模型研究了非工作时间入院和 DTB 时间与我们的主要结局测量值,即 30 天死亡率之间的关系,该模型调整了 STEMI 患者的危险因素。住院死亡率作为次要结局进行评估。
在 2007 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月期间接受 PPCI 的 76648 例患者记录中,我们对 42677 例入院进行了分析。56%的 PPCI 入院发生在非工作时间。非工作时间的 PPCI 入院与调整后 30 天死亡率增加的可能性相关(OR 1.13;95%CI 1.01 至 1.25)。非工作时间入院的 DTB 时间中位数较长(45 分钟;IQR 30-68)比正常时间(38 分钟;IQR 27-58;p<0.001)。在调整 DTB 时间后,PPCI 常规和非工作时间入院的调整后 30 天死亡率之间的差异减弱,不再具有统计学意义(OR 1.08;95%CI 0.97 至 1.20)。
与 PPCI 的非工作时间入院相关的调整后死亡率较高可能部分归因于 DTB 时间的差异。进一步研究应关注可能对服务快速可用性敏感的情况,其中护理及时性是结果的重要决定因素,以了解非工作时间效应。