Slade Eric P, Simoni-Wastila Linda
Dr. Slade is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (e-mail:
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jul;66(7):713-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400042. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
The ongoing transition from use of mostly branded to mostly generic second-generation antipsychotic medications could bring about a substantial reduction in Medicaid expenditures for antipsychotic medications, a change with critical implications for formulary restrictions on second-generation antipsychotics in Medicaid. This study provided a forecast of the impact of generics on Medicaid expenditures for antipsychotic medications.
Quarterly (N=816) state-level aggregate data on outpatient antipsychotic prescriptions in Medicaid between 2008 and 2011 were drawn from the Medicaid state drug utilization database. Annual numbers of prescriptions, expenditures, and cost per prescription were constructed for each antipsychotic medication. Forecasts of antipsychotic expenditures in calendar years 2016 and 2019 were developed on the basis of the estimated percentage reduction in Medicaid expenditures for risperidone, the only second-generation antipsychotic available generically throughout the study period. Two models of savings from generic risperidone use were estimated, one based on constant risperidone prices and the other based on variable risperidone prices. The sensitivity of the expenditure forecast to expected changes in Medicaid enrollment was also examined.
In the main model, annual Medicaid expenditures for antipsychotics were forecasted to decrease by $1,794 million (48.8%) by 2016 and by $2,814 million (76.5%) by 2019. Adjustment for variable prices of branded medications and changes in Medicaid enrollment only moderately affected the magnitude of these reductions.
Within five years, antipsychotic expenditures in Medicaid may decline to less than half their current levels. Such a spending reduction warrants a reassessment of the continued necessity of formulary restrictions for second-generation antipsychotics in Medicaid.
目前正从主要使用品牌第二代抗精神病药物向主要使用非专利第二代抗精神病药物转变,这可能会大幅降低医疗补助计划中抗精神病药物的支出,这一变化对医疗补助计划中第二代抗精神病药物的处方集限制具有关键影响。本研究预测了非专利药物对医疗补助计划中抗精神病药物支出的影响。
从医疗补助计划州药物利用数据库中提取2008年至2011年期间医疗补助计划中门诊抗精神病药物处方的季度(N = 816)州级汇总数据。为每种抗精神病药物构建年度处方数、支出和每张处方成本。基于整个研究期间唯一可获得非专利药的利培酮在医疗补助计划支出中的估计减少百分比,对2016年和2019年日历年的抗精神病药物支出进行预测。估计了使用非专利利培酮节省费用的两种模型,一种基于利培酮价格不变,另一种基于利培酮价格可变。还研究了支出预测对医疗补助计划参保人数预期变化的敏感性。
在主要模型中,预计到2016年医疗补助计划中抗精神病药物的年度支出将减少17.94亿美元(48.8%),到2019年将减少28.14亿美元(76.5%)。对品牌药物价格变化和医疗补助计划参保人数变化进行调整仅对这些减少幅度产生适度影响。
在五年内,医疗补助计划中的抗精神病药物支出可能降至目前水平的一半以下。如此大幅的支出减少值得重新评估医疗补助计划中对第二代抗精神病药物继续进行处方集限制的必要性。