Ordiz Andrés, Støen Ole-Gunnar, Delibes Miguel, Swenson Jon E
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postbox 5003, NO-1432, Ås, Norway.
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, NO-7485, Trondheim, Norway.
Oecologia. 2017 Oct;185(2):191-194. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-3948-7. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
Pigeon et al. (2016) Staying cool in a changing landscape: the influence of maximum daily ambient temperature on grizzly bear habitat selection. Oecologia 181:1101. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3630-5 analyzed the effect of ambient temperature on the habitat selection of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Alberta, Canada. They concluded that temperature played a significant role in bear habitat selection and that it was unlikely that human activity introduced biases to the habitat selection of bears. However, Pigeon et al. did not consider variables related to human activities in their analyses. They also misinterpreted previous research that has accounted for temperature in the habitat selection of brown bears. There is much literature published on the negative effects of human disturbance on wildlife in general and on bears in particular. Downplaying the role of human disturbance could have important negative consequences if, in fact, human disturbance were a more important factor than thermoregulation. Indeed, dismissing the importance of human influence, in the face of contradictory evidence, could tempt managers to disregard an important factor that is difficult and often unpopular to deal with in their conservation plans.
皮金等人(2016年)《在不断变化的环境中保持凉爽:每日最高环境温度对灰熊栖息地选择的影响》。《生态学》181卷:1101页。doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3630-5分析了环境温度对加拿大艾伯塔省灰熊(棕熊)栖息地选择的影响。他们得出结论,温度在熊的栖息地选择中起着重要作用,并且人类活动不太可能给熊的栖息地选择带来偏差。然而,皮金等人在分析中没有考虑与人类活动相关的变量。他们还错误解读了之前在棕熊栖息地选择中考虑温度因素的研究。关于人类干扰对野生动物尤其是对熊的负面影响,有大量文献发表。如果事实上人类干扰比体温调节更重要,那么淡化人类干扰的作用可能会产生重要的负面后果。的确,面对相互矛盾的证据却忽视人类影响的重要性,可能会诱使管理者在其保护计划中忽略一个难以应对且往往不受欢迎的重要因素。