Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, Aarhus, Denmark2National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark3Centre for Integrated Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden5Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;72(7):635-41. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0346.
Schizophrenia has a complex etiology influenced both by genetic and nongenetic factors but disentangling these factors is difficult.
To estimate (1) how strongly the risk for schizophrenia relates to the mutual effect of the polygenic risk score, parental socioeconomic status, and family history of psychiatric disorders; (2) the fraction of cases that could be prevented if no one was exposed to these factors; (3) whether family background interacts with an individual's genetic liability so that specific subgroups are particularly risk prone; and (4) to what extent a proband's genetic makeup mediates the risk associated with familial background.
DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a nested case-control study based on Danish population-based registers. The study consisted of 866 patients diagnosed as having schizophrenia between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2006, and 871 matched control individuals. Genome-wide data and family psychiatric and socioeconomic background information were obtained from neonatal biobanks and national registers. Results from a separate meta-analysis (34,600 cases and 45,968 control individuals) were applied to calculate polygenic risk scores.
Polygenic risk scores, parental socioeconomic status, and family psychiatric history.
Odds ratios (ORs), attributable risks, liability R2 values, and proportions mediated.
Schizophrenia was associated with the polygenic risk score (OR, 8.01; 95% CI, 4.53-14.16 for highest vs lowest decile), socioeconomic status (OR, 8.10; 95% CI, 3.24-20.3 for 6 vs no exposures), and a history of schizophrenia/psychoses (OR, 4.18; 95% CI, 2.57-6.79). The R2 values were 3.4% (95% CI, 2.1-4.6) for the polygenic risk score, 3.1% (95% CI, 1.9-4.3) for parental socioeconomic status, and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.1-4.6) for family history. Socioeconomic status and psychiatric history accounted for 45.8% (95% CI, 36.1-55.5) and 25.8% (95% CI, 21.2-30.5) of cases, respectively. There was an interaction between the polygenic risk score and family history (P = .03). A total of 17.4% (95% CI, 9.1-26.6) of the effect associated with family history of schizophrenia/psychoses was mediated through the polygenic risk score.
Schizophrenia was associated with the polygenic risk score, family psychiatric history, and socioeconomic status. Our study demonstrated that family history of schizophrenia/psychoses is partly mediated through the individual's genetic liability.
精神分裂症的病因复杂,受遗传和非遗传因素的影响,但要理清这些因素很困难。
估计 (1) 精神分裂症的风险与多基因风险评分、父母社会经济地位和精神疾病家族史的相互影响有多大;(2) 如果没有人接触这些因素,可预防的病例比例;(3) 家族背景是否与个体的遗传易感性相互作用,使特定亚组特别容易患病;以及 (4) 先证者的遗传构成在多大程度上可以调节与家族背景相关的风险。
设计、地点和参与者:我们进行了一项基于丹麦人群为基础的登记处的嵌套病例对照研究。该研究包括 1994 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 12 月 31 日期间被诊断为患有精神分裂症的 866 名患者和 871 名匹配的对照个体。全基因组数据和家族精神病史及社会经济背景信息来自新生儿生物库和国家登记处。应用来自独立荟萃分析(34600 例病例和 45968 例对照)的结果计算多基因风险评分。
多基因风险评分、父母社会经济地位和家族精神病史。
比值比 (OR)、归因风险、易感性 R2 值和介导比例。
精神分裂症与多基因风险评分(最高与最低十分位数相比,OR 8.01;95% CI 4.53-14.16)、社会经济地位(6 次与无暴露相比,OR 8.10;95% CI 3.24-20.3)和精神分裂症/精神病家族史(OR 4.18;95% CI 2.57-6.79)相关。R2 值分别为多基因风险评分 3.4%(95% CI 2.1-4.6)、父母社会经济地位 3.1%(95% CI 1.9-4.3)和家族史 3.4%(95% CI 2.1-4.6)。社会经济地位和精神病史分别占病例的 45.8%(95% CI 36.1-55.5)和 25.8%(95% CI 21.2-30.5)。多基因风险评分与家族史之间存在交互作用(P=0.03)。家族精神分裂症/精神病史相关的 17.4%(95% CI 9.1-26.6)的效应通过多基因风险评分介导。
精神分裂症与多基因风险评分、家族精神病史和社会经济地位有关。我们的研究表明,家族精神分裂症/精神病史部分通过个体的遗传易感性来介导。