Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH), Aarhus, Denmark.
National Centre for Register-Based Research (NCRR), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1;78(4):387-397. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4172.
Combining information on polygenic risk scores (PRSs) with other known risk factors could potentially improve the identification of risk of depression in the general population. However, to our knowledge, no study has estimated the association of PRS with the absolute risk of depression, and few have examined combinations of the PRS and other important risk factors, including parental history of psychiatric disorders and socioeconomic status (SES), in the identification of depression risk.
To assess the individual and joint associations of PRS, parental history, and SES with relative and absolute risk of early-onset depression.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This case-cohort study included participants from the iPSYCH2012 sample, a case-cohort sample of all singletons born in Denmark between May 1, 1981, and December 31, 2005. Hazard ratios (HRs) and absolute risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression for case-cohort designs.
The PRS for depression; SES measured using maternal educational level, maternal marital status, and paternal employment; and parental history of psychiatric disorders (major depression, bipolar disorder, other mood or psychotic disorders, and other psychiatric diagnoses).
Hospital-based diagnosis of depression from inpatient, outpatient, or emergency settings.
Participants included 17 098 patients with depression (11 748 [68.7%] female) and 18 582 (9429 [50.7%] male) individuals randomly selected from the base population. The PRS, parental history, and lower SES were all significantly associated with increased risk of depression, with HRs ranging from 1.32 (95% CI, 1.29-1.35) per 1-SD increase in PRS to 2.23 (95% CI, 1.81-2.64) for maternal history of mood or psychotic disorders. Fully adjusted models had similar effect sizes, suggesting that these risk factors do not confound one another. Absolute risk of depression by the age of 30 years differed substantially, depending on an individual's combination of risk factors, ranging from 1.0% (95% CI, 0.1%-2.0%) among men with high SES in the bottom 2% of the PRS distribution to 23.7% (95% CI, 16.6%-30.2%) among women in the top 2% of PRS distribution with a parental history of psychiatric disorders.
This study suggests that current PRSs for depression are not more likely to be associated with major depressive disorder than are other known risk factors; however, they may be useful for the identification of risk in conjunction with other risk factors.
将多基因风险评分 (PRS) 与其他已知风险因素相结合,可能有助于提高对普通人群中抑郁风险的识别。然而,据我们所知,尚无研究估计 PRS 与抑郁的绝对风险之间的关联,而且很少有研究在识别抑郁风险时检查 PRS 与其他重要风险因素(包括父母的精神疾病史和社会经济地位 (SES))的组合。
评估 PRS、父母病史和 SES 对早发性抑郁的相对和绝对风险的个体和联合关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这项病例-队列研究纳入了 iPSYCH2012 样本中的参与者,该样本是丹麦所有 1981 年 5 月 1 日至 2005 年 12 月 31 日期间出生的单胎的病例-队列样本。使用 Cox 比例风险回归估计病例-队列设计中的风险比 (HR) 和绝对风险。
用于抑郁的 PRS;SES 通过母亲的教育水平、母亲的婚姻状况和父亲的就业状况来衡量;以及父母的精神疾病史(重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍、其他情绪或精神病障碍,以及其他精神科诊断)。
在住院、门诊或急诊环境下基于医院的抑郁诊断。
参与者包括 17098 名患有抑郁症的患者(11748 名[68.7%]女性)和 18582 名(9429 名[50.7%]男性)从基础人群中随机选择的个体。PRS、父母病史和较低的 SES 均与抑郁风险增加显著相关,HR 范围从 PRS 每增加 1 个标准差(95%CI,1.29-1.35)到母亲有情绪或精神病障碍史(95%CI,1.81-2.64)。充分调整后的模型具有相似的效应大小,表明这些风险因素彼此之间没有混杂。到 30 岁时的抑郁绝对风险差异很大,这取决于个体的风险因素组合,从 PRS 分布底部 2%的 SES 较高的男性中 1.0%(95%CI,0.1%-2.0%)到 PRS 分布顶部 2%的女性中 23.7%(95%CI,16.6%-30.2%),后者有父母的精神疾病史。
这项研究表明,目前用于抑郁的 PRS 与重度抑郁症的相关性并不高于其他已知风险因素;然而,它们可能与其他风险因素结合使用,有助于识别风险。