Suppr超能文献

一种多学科的三阶段方法,以提高患者安全指标的临床效用。

A multidisciplinary three-phase approach to improve the clinical utility of patient safety indicators.

作者信息

Najjar Peter, Kachalia Allen, Sutherland Tori, Beloff Jennifer, David-Kasdan Jo Ann, Bates David W, Urman Richard D

机构信息

Department of Surgery (Dr Najjar), Department of Quality and Safety, (Drs Najjar and Kachalia and Mss Beloff and David-Kasdan), Department of Medicine (Drs Kachalia and Bates), and Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine (Dr Urman), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Dr Sutherland), Harvard Medical School (Drs Najjar, Kachalia, Sutherland, Bates, Urman), Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;24(2):62-8. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000057.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) are used for calculation of risk-adjusted postoperative rates for adverse events. The payers and quality consortiums are increasingly requiring public reporting of hospital performance on these metrics. We discuss processes designed to improve the accuracy and clinical utility of PSI reporting in practice.

METHODS

The study was conducted at a 793-bed tertiary care academic medical center where PSI processes have been aggressively implemented to track patient safety events at discharge. A three-phased approach to improving administrative data quality was implemented. The initiative consisted of clinical review of all PSIs, documentation improvement, and provider outreach including active querying for patient safety events.

RESULTS

This multidisciplinary effort to develop a streamlined process for PSI calculation reduced the reporting of miscoded PSIs and increased the clinical utility of PSI monitoring. Over 4 quarters, 4 of 41 (10%) PSI-11 and 9 of 138 (7%) PSI-15 errors were identified on review of clinical documentation and appropriate adjustments were made.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary, phased approach leveraging existing billing infrastructure for robust metric coding, ongoing clinical review, and frontline provider outreach is a novel and effective way to reduce the reporting of false-positive outcomes and improve the clinical utility of PSIs.

摘要

目的

美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标(PSIs)用于计算不良事件的风险调整后术后发生率。支付方和质量联盟越来越要求公开报告医院在这些指标上的表现。我们讨论了旨在提高实践中PSI报告准确性和临床实用性的流程。

方法

该研究在一家拥有793张床位的三级医疗学术医学中心进行,该中心已积极实施PSI流程以跟踪出院时的患者安全事件。实施了一种分三个阶段提高行政数据质量的方法。该倡议包括对所有PSI进行临床审查、改进文档记录以及与医疗服务提供者进行沟通,包括主动询问患者安全事件。

结果

这项旨在为PSI计算开发简化流程的多学科努力减少了编码错误的PSI报告,并提高了PSI监测的临床实用性。在四个季度里,通过对临床文档的审查,发现41个PSI - 11中有4个(10%)以及138个PSI - 15中有9个(7%)存在错误,并进行了适当调整。

结论

一种利用现有计费基础设施进行可靠指标编码、持续临床审查和一线医疗服务提供者沟通的多学科、分阶段方法,是减少假阳性结果报告并提高PSI临床实用性的新颖且有效方式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验