Tsukuda M, Kuwabara Y, Ichiya Y, Otsuka M, Tahara T, Miyake Y, Mizuguchi M, Gunasekera R, Masuda K
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15(11):746-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00631769.
We evaluated the significance of redistribution in 123I-IMP SPECT study using PET. Twelve lesions in ten patients were selected. These lesions were classified into the following three groups; ischemia, infarction of subacute phase and infarction of chronic phase. All lesions with ischemia or subacute infarction showed good or moderate redistribution. Three of four lesions with chronic infarction showed no redistribution. The mean values of rCBF and rCMRO2 were highest in the lesions with good redistribution, but there was no differences in rOEF with the degree of redistribution. In conclusion, the tissue with good redistribution is not always viable and it was impossible to predict a region with increased rOEF by redistribution alone.
我们使用正电子发射断层扫描(PET)评估了123I-异碘普胺单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)研究中再分布的意义。从10名患者中选取了12个病灶。这些病灶被分为以下三组:缺血、亚急性期梗死和慢性期梗死。所有缺血或亚急性梗死的病灶均显示良好或中度再分布。4个慢性梗死病灶中有3个未显示再分布。再分布良好的病灶中,相对脑血流量(rCBF)和相对脑氧代谢率(rCMRO2)的平均值最高,但相对脑氧摄取分数(rOEF)与再分布程度之间无差异。总之,再分布良好的组织不一定存活,仅通过再分布无法预测rOEF升高的区域。