• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较报告给美国毒物控制中心的利右苯丙胺和右旋苯丙胺暴露情况。

Comparison of lisdexamfetamine and dextroamphetamine exposures reported to U.S. poison centers.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, Maryland Poison Center, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , Baltimore, MD , USA.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015 Jun;53(5):477-85. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1027903. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

DOI:10.3109/15563650.2015.1027903
PMID:25832473
Abstract

CONTEXT

Lisdexamfetamine is a pro-drug stimulant that requires the enzymatic hydrolysis of lysine from dexamphetamine for pharmacologic effects. There is limited information comparing non-therapeutic lisdexamfetamine and dextroamphetamine exposures.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare lisdexamfetamine exposures with dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release.

METHODS

A retrospective observational case series of single-substance exposures to lisdexamfetamine, dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release, or dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release reported to the National Poison Data System from 2007 to 2012 was performed. Data were analyzed for demographics, reason, clinical effects, management site, and outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 23,553 exposures: lisdexamfetamine (7,113), dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release (6,245), and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release (10,195). The most frequent clinical effects observed for lisdexamfetamine, dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release, and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release were agitation (19.8%, 21.7%, and 25.1%, respectively) and tachycardia (19.2%, 22.8%, and 23.9%, respectively). The reason was most often exploratory (93.4%) in children < 6 years and therapeutic error (65.6%) in children aged 6-12 years. In adolescents and adults most common reasons were suicide attempts (28.4%) followed by abuse (19.5%) and therapeutic errors (18.8%). Overall, 61.6% of cases were managed in a health care facility, with the majority treated in the emergency department only. The majority of cases (76.0%) experienced no or minor effects. More serious outcomes (moderate/major/death) occurred in 21.2% of lisdexamfetamine, 24.7% of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release, and 25.5% of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release. There were 4 deaths (1 dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release and 3 dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release). In patients aged 6 years and more, abuse/misuse was more frequently reported for dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release (32.5%) and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release (23.0%) than that for lisdexamfetamine (13.5%). The odds of abuse/misuse was 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-2.4) times higher for dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release than that for lisdexamfetamine and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release combined; the odds of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release abuse/misuse was 1.9 (95% CI: 1.7-2.2) times higher than lisdexamfetamine. In 2011, the number of lisdexamfetamine abuse/misuse cases exceeded dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release by approximately 26% and plateaued in 2012, but was significantly lower (∼75%) than dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release.

CONCLUSIONS

Toxic effects were similar for all three drugs. Although the majority of cases were treated at health care facilities, the majority of patients experienced no effects or minor toxicity. Serious outcomes occurred in approximately 21% of lisdexamfetamine and 25% of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine extended release and dextroamphetamine/amphetamine immediate release. Lisdexamfetamine may have less abuse potential, especially compared with the immediate-release dextroamphetamine/amphetamine formulation.

摘要

背景

Lisdexamfetamine 是一种前体药物兴奋剂,需要赖氨酸从右旋苯丙胺中酶解才能发挥药理作用。目前比较非治疗性 lisdexamfetamine 和右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺释放的数据有限。

目的

本研究旨在比较 lisdexamfetamine 与右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺缓释和右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺即时释放的暴露情况。

方法

对 2007 年至 2012 年国家毒物数据系统报告的单一物质暴露于 lisdexamfetamine、右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺缓释或右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺即时释放的回顾性观察性病例系列进行了分析。对人口统计学、原因、临床效果、管理场所和结果进行了分析。

结果

共报告了 23553 例暴露:lisdexamfetamine(7113)、右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺缓释(6245)和右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺即时释放(10195)。观察到最常见的临床效果是激动(19.8%、21.7%和 25.1%)和心动过速(19.2%、22.8%和 23.9%),对于 lisdexamfetamine、右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺缓释和右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺即时释放。原因主要是儿童<6 岁的探索性(93.4%)和儿童 6-12 岁的治疗错误(65.6%)。在青少年和成年人中,最常见的原因是自杀企图(28.4%),其次是滥用(19.5%)和治疗错误(18.8%)。总体而言,61.6%的病例在医疗机构接受治疗,其中大多数仅在急诊科治疗。大多数病例(76.0%)无或轻度影响。更严重的后果(中度/重度/死亡)发生在 lisdexamfetamine(21.2%)、右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺缓释(24.7%)和右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺即时释放(25.5%)。有 4 例死亡(1 例右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺缓释和 3 例右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺即时释放)。在 6 岁及以上的患者中,右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺即时释放(32.5%)和右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺缓释(23.0%)的滥用/误用较 lisdexamfetamine(13.5%)更为常见。右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺即时释放的滥用/误用的几率是 lisdexamfetamine 的 2.3 倍(95%置信区间[CI]:2.0-2.4),右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺缓释的滥用/误用几率是 lisdexamfetamine 的 1.9 倍(95%CI:1.7-2.2)。2011 年,lisdexamfetamine 滥用/误用病例数比右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺缓释多约 26%,并在 2012 年达到平台期,但仍明显低于右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺即时释放(约 75%)。

结论

这三种药物的毒性作用相似。虽然大多数病例在医疗机构接受治疗,但大多数患者无影响或毒性较小。大约 21%的 lisdexamfetamine 和 25%的右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺缓释和右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺即时释放发生严重后果。与即时释放的右旋苯丙胺/苯丙胺制剂相比,lisdexamfetamine 的滥用潜力可能较小。

相似文献

1
Comparison of lisdexamfetamine and dextroamphetamine exposures reported to U.S. poison centers.比较报告给美国毒物控制中心的利右苯丙胺和右旋苯丙胺暴露情况。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015 Jun;53(5):477-85. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1027903. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
2
Comparison of pediatric atypical antipsychotic exposures reported to U.S. poison centers.向美国毒物控制中心报告的儿科非典型抗精神病药物暴露情况比较。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2017 Jan;55(1):40-45. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2016.1233342. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
3
Pediatric ADHD Medication Exposures Reported to US Poison Control Centers.美国中毒控制中心报告的儿科注意缺陷多动障碍药物暴露情况。
Pediatrics. 2018 Jun;141(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3872. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Toxicity and clinical outcomes of paliperidone exposures reported to U.S. Poison Centers.美国中毒控制中心报告的帕利哌酮暴露的毒性和临床结局。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014 Mar;52(3):207-13. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.882000.
5
Stimulant storm - state health department psychostimulant age-adjusted mortality rate correlates with psychostimulant-based Michigan Poison Center case exposures over time.兴奋剂风暴 - 州卫生部门的精神兴奋剂年龄调整死亡率与精神兴奋剂为基础的密歇根毒物中心病例暴露随时间的变化相关。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021 Aug;59(8):740-745. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2020.1853143. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
Methylphenidate poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.哌甲酯中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007 Oct-Nov;45(7):737-52. doi: 10.1080/15563650701665175.
7
The efficacy and safety profile of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a prodrug of d-amphetamine, for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adults.右苯丙胺二甲磺酸盐(一种d-苯丙胺的前体药物)用于治疗儿童和成人注意力缺陷多动障碍的疗效和安全性概况。
Clin Ther. 2009 Jan;31(1):142-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.01.015.
8
Evaluation of quetiapine abuse and misuse reported to poison centers.对向中毒控制中心报告的喹硫平滥用和误用情况的评估。
J Addict Med. 2014 May-Jun;8(3):195-8. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000020.
9
Sustained stimulation? Characteristics of modified release and immediate release stimulant exposures reported to the national poison data system.持续刺激?国家毒物数据系统报告的修改释放和即时释放兴奋剂暴露的特征。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021 Mar;59(3):200-207. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2020.1787428. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
10
Ventricular dysrhythmias associated with poisoning and drug overdose: a 10-year review of statewide poison control center data from California.与中毒和药物过量相关的室性心律失常:对加利福尼亚州全州中毒控制中心数据的十年回顾
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2015 Feb;15(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s40256-014-0104-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cannabis and Other Substance Misuse: Implications and Regulations.大麻及其他物质滥用:影响与监管
Toxics. 2023 Sep 6;11(9):756. doi: 10.3390/toxics11090756.
2
Prescription psychostimulants for cocaine use disorder: A review from molecular basis to clinical approach.治疗可卡因使用障碍的处方精神兴奋剂:从分子基础到临床方法的综述。
Addict Biol. 2023;28(4):e13271. doi: 10.1111/adb.13271.
3
Rise, and pronounced regional variation, in methylphenidate, amphetamine, and lisdexamfetamine distribution in the United States.美国哌甲酯、苯丙胺和赖氨酸右旋苯丙胺的分布呈上升趋势且存在显著的地区差异。
PeerJ. 2021 Dec 21;9:e12619. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12619. eCollection 2021.
4
Converging vulnerability factors for compulsive food and drug use.强迫性食物和药物使用的趋同脆弱性因素。
Neuropharmacology. 2021 Sep 15;196:108556. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108556. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
5
Accidental intoxications in toddlers: lack of cross-reactivity of vilazodone and its urinary metabolite M17 with drug of abuse screening immunoassays.幼儿意外中毒:伏硫西汀及其尿液代谢物M17与药物滥用筛查免疫测定法缺乏交叉反应性。
BMC Clin Pathol. 2019 Feb 18;19:2. doi: 10.1186/s12907-019-0084-9. eCollection 2019.
6
A case series involving young children presenting with accidental ingestion of amphetamine based stimulants.一个涉及幼儿意外摄入苯丙胺类兴奋剂的病例系列。
Toxicol Rep. 2018 Nov 3;5:1129-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.11.001. eCollection 2018.
7
Trends in use of prescription stimulants in the United States and Territories, 2006 to 2016.2006 年至 2016 年美国属地处方兴奋剂使用趋势。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0206100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206100. eCollection 2018.
8
Acute effects of lisdexamfetamine and D-amphetamine on social cognition and cognitive performance in a placebo-controlled study in healthy subjects.在一项健康受试者的安慰剂对照研究中,研究了利右苯丙胺和 D-苯丙胺对社会认知和认知表现的急性影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 May;235(5):1389-1402. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4849-0. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
9
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lisdexamfetamine Compared with D-Amphetamine in Healthy Subjects.在健康受试者中,与右旋苯丙胺相比,赖氨酸安非他命的药代动力学和药效学研究
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Sep 7;8:617. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00617. eCollection 2017.
10
An Infant with a Prolonged Sympathomimetic Toxidrome after Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Ingestion.一名婴儿在摄入二甲基苯丙胺后出现延长的拟交感神经中毒综合征。
J Med Toxicol. 2016 Dec;12(4):402-405. doi: 10.1007/s13181-016-0560-x. Epub 2016 Jun 8.