Morar Florin-Stefan
*Department of the History of Science,Harvard University,Science Center 371, Cambridge, MA 02138,United States. Email:
Br J Hist Sci. 2015 Mar;48(1):123-46. doi: 10.1017/S0007087414000429.
This paper argues that we should take into account the process of historical transmission to enrich our understanding of material culture. More specifically, I want to show how the rewriting of history and the invention of tradition impact material objects and our beliefs about them. I focus here on the transmission history of the mechanical calculator invented by the German savant Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Leibniz repeatedly described his machine as functional and wonderfully useful, but in reality it was never finished and didn't fully work. Its internal structure also remained unknown. In 1879, however, the machine re-emerged and was reinvented as the origin of all later calculating machines based on the stepped drum, to protect the priority of the German Leibniz against the Frenchman Thomas de Colmar as the father of mechanical calculation. The calculator was later replicated to demonstrate that it could function 'after all', in an effort to deepen this narrative and further enhance Leibniz's computing acumen.
本文认为,我们应该考虑历史传承的过程,以丰富我们对物质文化的理解。更具体地说,我想展示历史的改写和传统的发明如何影响物质对象以及我们对它们的看法。我在此聚焦于德国学者戈特弗里德·威廉·莱布尼茨发明的机械计算器的传承历史。莱布尼茨多次将他的机器描述为实用且非常有用,但实际上它从未完成,也未能完全正常运行。其内部结构也一直不为人知。然而,在1879年,这台机器重新出现,并被重新塑造为所有后来基于步进鼓的计算器的起源,以维护德国的莱布尼茨相对于法国人托马斯·德·科尔马作为机械计算之父的优先权。这台计算器后来被复制,以证明它“终究”能够运行,旨在深化这一叙述,并进一步提升莱布尼茨的计算能力。